Page 1 - Lessons Learned from Getting to Not Guilty_FORTHEDEFENSE_vol4_issue4_2019
P. 1

Lessons Learned from





       Getting to Not Guilty









                                                                              Sharon L. McCarthy and Jay Nanavati


       E                                                          falls on trial counsel, who must do all that he or
               very criminal defense attorney knows that
                                                                  she ethically can to provide a vigorous, credible,
               being indicted is a life-changing event for
               a client.  In many cases, white-collar clients
        have never even been issued a traffic ticket              effective defense of the client before a jury. In this
                                                                  article, we share lessons learned and successful
        and often are highly respected in their business          trial strategies from three of our cases, based upon
        communities. Yet a federal indictment for most            listening closely to our clients with an open mind.
        white-collar offenses carries with it the prospect        Of these cases, two trials ended in acquittal, and
        of not only a felony conviction, but prison time,         one ended in pre-trial dismissal of the indictment.
        which, in most cases, is determined by the amount           In U.S. v. John Doe,   which was tried in the
                                                                                       1
        of money at issue in the alleged crime. One of the        District of Kansas, Mr. Doe’s wife was charged with
        most difficult decisions for the client is whether        a multi-year scheme to underreport income and
        to accept a plea offer from the government and            overreport expenses from the medical aesthetics
        the certainty of a lower sentence even if only            clinic that she owned in suburban Kansas City. Jay
        based on acceptance of responsibility, or risk            Nanavati represented John Doe who, in addition
        going to trial and face what most certainly will          to being his wife’s boyfriend at the time of the
        be a higher sentence once the court has heard             alleged crime, performed maintenance work at
        all of the government’s evidence. Once the client         her clinic. The government alleged that Mr. Doe
        chooses to go to trial, the burden of that decision       assisted his wife in creating a fictitious business

                              l
         38     For The Defense     Vol. 4, Issue 4
   1   2   3   4