Page 43 - Anaphylaxis in Schools & Other Settings, 3rd Edition Revised
P. 43
TIPS
When drafting school communication, it is important for principals and teachers to present a balanced picture of anaphylaxis in order to avoid creating unnecessary anxiety or establishing unrealistic expectations for the school community. This can be done in collaboration with school nurses (where available). While anaphylaxis has the potential to cause severe reactions and death, risks can be significantly reduced through effective management strategies and emergency procedures.
In the case of food-related allergic reactions, studies have shown that anaphylactic shock and fatalities most often occur when people at risk accidentally ingest something to which they are allergic and
do not receive epinephrine in time. Underlying asthma and age of victims (most often older children, teens, and young adults) have also been contributing factors.
While many schools have asked families not to bring specific foods (e.g. peanuts), it is difficult to ensure compliance with food restrictions on an ongoing basis. Therefore, it is preferable to avoid using phrases such as:
‘Peanut-free’, ‘tree nut-free’ or ‘guarantee’ – when referring to a school environment or policy. ‘Ban’ – this term tends to be divisive for the community and can be misleading. Similar to a
guarantee, it is impossible to ensure complete compliance with a food ban.
The allergen-free signs (e.g. peanut-free) used by some schools can serve as a reminder that certain products aren’t allowed. However, an allergen-free environment cannot be guaranteed and safety rules should still be followed.
Anaphylaxis in Schools & Other Settings
© 2005-2016 Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
39
Appendix F
