Page 45 - Sample_ITNJ_Book

• dealing with trading in personal data including ‘professional firms’ operating schemes of ‘sweating the assets’ that is to say information of clients and targets, to fuel long term networks and alignments;
• providing for registers with integrity which do not separate ‘lawyers’ (no evidence required) and landowners.
Until the repair happens in practice there is an anonymized lock-in of the Target in the courts, whose identity and property are taken and used. This includes in out of court ‘contracts,’ i.e. ‘commercially’ binding contracts on those seeking to join or operate in a network but otherwise void ab initio. The transaction expenses are underwritten by the Target’s estate, and there is no mechanism to get out. The conditions of slavery servitude and forced labour for no pay continue indefinitely. In other words the judicial system, guardian of the sanctity of human life, operates to close a person down, whilst outside the court the message goes ‘close the family files’ or there is an undocumented threat.
The effectiveness can be measured by the ‘buy-
in’ cost, for example joining a limited liability partnership operating on a debenture from a bank. The bank has full rights at any time, that is the operation is wholly tied to the bank (in essence bank lending to itself).
The individual must bring business with him. He/
his new firm is at the bottom of the rankings, similar to rankings on access to insider information. They will be the middleman for breaking the Target down, hiring others who hire burglars, locksmiths, forgers; getting ‘inside;’ linking with those operating in tax havens with secret ownership. They will carry up front bank indemnity as incentive/guarantee, heavily rewarded on route as debentures are churned and the
greatest skin in the game. The network (the whole Ponzi scheme) is at risk if the Target(s) or any part of it survives.
Once such ‘buy in’ price has become a ‘norm,’ including heightened risk and stakes, all bets are off as to the eventual outcome.
The global economic uncertainty together with the impact of market instability is not easily capable of being quantified.
FORWARD LOOKING
The Commission has opened in times of circumstances of extreme global uncertainty (April 2018). This gives a moving backdrop. Most public enquiries are forced to focus on boundaries and fixing the questions they seek to have answered or issues exposed. Inevitably this means they suffer from ‘built in obsolescence.’ A recent example is
a House of Lords enquiry which has published research on BREXIT transition and post BREXIT
in regard the European courts for dealing with disputes, with preliminary conclusions of diminished influence and accountability. It is to be used to inform debate. The scope was set to exclude ECHR. The Commission can usefully make use of this preliminary research work, yet incorporating evidence as to the extent the encountered difficulties are remedied through the ECHR, rather than embarking on primary research itself.
Challenges and opportunities for the Commission are to take advantage of being nimble and flexible such that it can accommodate contemporaneous developments and manage obsolescence risk; to shine a light where previous there was darkness; whilst taking those steps necessary to ensure accessibility for those in the position to be able to curtail aberrations and, worse, trading in them.
I.T.N.J