Page 1 - WSAAG091_Sequence of Returns Flyer
P. 1

Strategic Use of Home Equity in Retirement Planning

                                Managing the Sequence of Returns Risk Scenario



      The Challenge: When taking income distributions from an invest-  The Solution: Consider taking withdrawals from a Home Equi-
      ment portfolio, market downturns can have a devastating impact   ty Conversion Mortgage (HECM) Line of Credit in down markets.
      on the longevity of the portfolio, often causing assets to deplete   This allows clients to maintain income requirements without
      too soon.                                                    depleting portfolio assets.



              HECM as a Last Resort Strategy                              HECM Portfolio Longevity Strategy


                                  Portfolio           Portfolio                               Portfolio          Portfolio
       Age  Year  Portfolio  HECM LOC   Value Start   Portfolio   Value End   Age  Year  Portfolio  HECM LOC   Value Start   Portfolio   Value End
                  Draws   Draws    of Year  Performance  of Year              Draws   Draws    of Year  Performance  of Year

       62   1973  $27,500         $500,000   -9.30%   $428,652     62   1973  $27,500         $500,000   -9.30%   $428,652
       63   1974  $28,463         $428,652   -15.50%  $338,120     63   1974          $28,463  $428,652   -15.50%  $362,168
       64   1975  $29,459          $338,120   22.30%  $377,493     64   1975          $29,459  $362,168   22.30%  $442,932
       65   1976  $30,490          $377,493   17.90%  $409,013     65   1976  $30,490         $442,932   17.90%   $486,145
       66   1977  $31,557         $409,013   -4.10%   $361,905     66   1977  $31,557          $486,145   -4.10%  $435,859
       67   1978  $32,661         $361,905   2.20%    $336,552     67   1978          $32,661  $435,859   2.20%  $445,535
       68   1979  $33,805         $336,552   8.00%    $326,998     68   1979  $33,805         $445,535   8.00%    $444,710
       69   1980  $34,988         $326,998   15.40%   $337,009     69   1980  $34,988          $444,710   15.40%  $472,861
       70   1981  $36,212         $337,009   -1.40%   $296,706     70   1981  $36,212          $472,861   -1.40%  $430,710
       71   1982  $37,480         $296,706   25.20%   $324,655     71   1982          $37,480  $430,710  25.20%   $539,422
       72   1983  $38,791         $324,655   13.30%   $323,941     72   1983  $38,791         $539,422   13.30%   $567,314
                                                      $308,935
       73   1984  $40,149          $323,941   8.90%   Different         1984  $40,149          $567,314  8.90%    $573,872
                                                                   73
       74   1985  $41,554         $308,935   25.20%   $334,734     74   1985  $41,554          $573,872  25.20%  $666,408
                                             15.20% Outcomes
       75   1986  $43,009         $334,734            $336,068     75   1986  $43,009         $666,408   15.20%   $718,156
       76   1987  $44,514         $336,068   3.40%    $301,496     76   1987  $44,514          $718,156  3.40%    $696,613
       77   1988  $46,072          $301,496   10.30% $0  VS  $1,086,997      $46,072          $696,613   10.30%   $717,742
                                                      $281,809
                                                                   77
                                                                        1988
       78   1989  $47,685         $281,809   20.90%   $283,150     78   1989  $47,658          $717,742   20.90%  $810,367
       79   1990  $49,354          $283,150   1.00%   $236,087     79   1990  $49,354          $810,367   1.00%   $768,472
       80   1991  $51,081         $236,087   21.40%   $224,524     80   1991  $51,081          $768,472   21.40%  $870,625
       81   1992  $52,869          $224,524   5.60%    $181,268    81   1992  $52,869         $870,625   5.60%    $863,551
       82   1993  $54,719          $181,268   7.90%   $136,559     82   1993  $54,719          $863,551   7.90%   $872,810
       83   1994  $56,634         $136,559   -2.80%    $77,718     83   1994  $56,634          $872,810   -2.80%  $793,650
       84   1995  $58,617          $77,718   24.70%    $24,007     84   1995          $58,617  $793,650   24.70%  $997,459
       85   1996  $24,007   $36,661   $24,007   11.10%  $0         85   1996  $60,668         $997,459   11.10%  $1,040,493
       86   1997          $62,791    $0      19.30%     $0         86   1997  $62,792         $1,040,493   19.30%  $1,165,909
       87   1998          $64,989    $0      17.00%     $0         87   1998  $64,989         $1,165,909   17.00%  $1,287,967
       88   1999          $67,264    $0      7.80%      $0         88   1999  $67,264         $1,287,967   7.80%  $1,315,795
       89   2000          $69,618    $0      -0.90%     $0         89  2000  $69,618          $1,315,795   -0.90%  $1,234,712
       90   2001          $72,055    $0      -3.70%     $0         90   2001          $72,055  $1,234,712   -3.70%  $1,189,275
       91   2002          $74,576    $0      -8.60%     $0         91  2002           $74,577  $1,189,275   -8.60%  $1,086,997

      RESULTS   NET OUTCOME: LAST RESORT STRATEGY                RESULTS   NET OUTCOME: LONGEVITY STRATEGY
                Remaining Liquid Assets: $0                                Liquid Assets: $1,086,997
                Home Equity Remaining: $985,599                            Home Equity Remaining: $571,243
                Net Residual to Heirs: $985,599                            Net Residual to Heirs: $ 1,658,240
                Total AUM Fees: $70,796                                    Total AUM Fees: $221,172




      Assumptions: Starting portfolio of $500,000. Target withdrawal rate of 5.5% with a 3.5% annual increase for inflation. Home appreciation at 4%. Based on 1%
      AUM Fees. Net Residual to Heirs does not account for selling cost if real estate is sold.

      Illustration Source: Sacks & Sacks, Journal of Financial Planning, August 20, 2016. https://toolsforretirementplanning.com/2016/08/20/sacks-and-lafaye-case-
      study/
   1   2