Page 30 - MidJersey Business - September 2014
P. 30


1,831



CHARITABLE GIVING
IN MERCER COUNTY

{continued from page 26}

emphasizes a major conclusion funds should be categorized
that we reached in our re- as funds for education, there

search: Philanthropy does not is a difference in the type of 
necessarily provide immediate “educational” funds given to 
NUMBER OF 501(C)(3) CHARITIES OPERATED IN
relief to those most in need of Princeton University and those 
it. Additionally, to utilize phi- given to Trenton. The money MERCER COUNTY, HOLDING $29 BILLION IN ASSETS,
WHICH IS THE HIGHEST OF ANY COUNTY IN NEW JERSEY.
lanthropy most effectively, it is given to Princeton can hardly 
important to have an in-depth be categorized as helping 

understanding of communities people in need, especially when 
and their nuances.
contrasted to money given to we can observe that two huge which operate with the luxury 

As a corollary of understand- education in Trenton. Similar foundations, Princeton Univer- of tax-exempt status. Because 
ing the nuances within a com- to the special treatment that sity and the RWJ Foundation, these organizations do not have 

munity, we contend that any Princeton University should dominate philanthropy in to comply with any reporting 

further study of philanthropy receive when analyzing Mercer Mercer County; therefore, any measures, we must question 
in Mercer County should pay County, the RWJ Foundation future study about foundation whether many of them are 

special attention to both the needs to be treated as a special activity must take these consid- related to philanthropy in the 
RWJ Foundation and Princ- case.
erations into account.
purest sense of the word. Phi- 

eton University.
RWJ explains how most of lanthropy should address the 
Princeton receives a major the money that Mercer County needs of society, particularly 
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
portion of funds given to the donates outlows to the rest of The most pressing policy helping the poor and disen- 
county, funds most often the nation. The main recipient recommendation that we have franchised. We do not contend 

earmarked for education of RWJ Foundation money is for the philanthropic sector is to that organizations that further 
and research. While there
research in Washington, D.C. increase its transparency. With- philanthropic ideals should 

is little argument that these
In light of these two factors,
out transparency, it is nearly lose their tax-exempt status, 
impossible to reach a better rather that they increase the 

understanding of the how funds legitimacy of that status by 
are used in the philanthropic increasing transparency and 

sector, not to mention the dif- providing performance mea- 
sures. We contend the standard 
iculties presented in enforcing 
accountability with respect to to receive this tax-exempt 

the allocation of these funds.
status should be more akin to 
In addition to understanding the standards of evaluation and 

how institutions collect and transparency that governmen- 
distribute funds, we recom- tal entities follow.

mend that there should be an An increase in transparency 
effort to create more uniform will allow for future iterations 

performance measures so best of our research to yield more 
practices can be identiied and results. Speciically, we would 

further reined. Without these like to see future research focus 
performance measures, there is on individual giving, as it is 

no objective manner in which such a large portion of chari- 
we can determine what are the table contributions. However, 

most effective methods in de- without more access to detailed 
livering the services that phil- information, we believe that 

anthropic institutions strive to the next logical step in this line 

provide. Without an increase in of research would be to analyze 
transparency and an objective corporate giving and its impact 

measurement of performance, on the philanthropic sector. If 
we feel that it is fair for politi- the next group of researchers 

cians and the American public would like to focus on indi- 
to question the continuation
vidual giving before policies 

of tax exemptions for these in- that ensure transparency take 
stitutions. There are a diverse effect, we recommend that they 

group of active philanthropic utilize a well-administered sur- 
organizations today, many of
vey of the individual giving.


business
28 midJersey 


   28   29   30   31   32