Page 129 - Lakeland Catholic Technology Plan

To assist in the interpretation of this graph, interpretations of five indicators are provided.
• with respect to the Student Access and Use Indicator
• No school is at a Stage One or an Early Development Level;
• Six (6) schools are at a Stage Two or a Low Development Level;
• No school is at a Stage Three or a High Development Level; and
• No school is at a Stage Four or an Advanced Development Level.
• with respect to the Planning and Leadership Indicator
• One (1) school is at a Stage One or an Early Development Level;
• Five (5) schools are at a Stage Two or a Low Development Level;
• No school is at a Stage Three or a High Development Level; and
• No school is at a Stage Four or an Advanced Development Level.
• with respect to the Software and Hardware Indicator
• No school is at a Stage One or an Early Development Level;
• One (1) school is at a Stage Two or a Low Development Level;
• Four (4) schools are at a Stage Three or a High Development Level; and
• One (1) school is at a Stage Four or an Advanced Development Level.
• with respect to the Technical Support Indicator
• One (1) school is at a Stage One or an Early Development Level;
• Two (2) schools are at a Stage Two or a Low Development Level;
• Two (2) schools are at a Stage Three or a High Development Level; and
• One (1) school is at Stage Four or an Advanced Development Level.
• with respect to the Professional Development Indicator
• Three (3) schools are at a Stage One or an Early Development Level;
• One (1) school is at a Stage Two or a Low Development Level;
• Two (2) schools are at a Stage Three or a High Development Level; and
• No school is at Stage Four or an Advanced Development Level.
From this information a number of observations can be made on the stage of development of the existing District stages of technology integration, development and implementation.
For example:
• the characteristic stage of development, for a majority of District schools, is at a Stage Two (Low Development Level) or lower at a Stage One (Early Development Level).
• the characteristic stage of development, for a minority of Districtschools is at Stage Three (High Development Level) with a few schools at a Stage Four (Advanced Development Level) with respect to the Software and Hardware Indicator and Technical Support Indicator.
• noted exceptions are:
• the Teacher Access Indicator, where half of the schools (3 out of 6 or 50%) are characterized as at a Stage Three or a High Development Level;
• the Software and Hardware Indicator, where 4 out of 6 or 66% are characterized as at a Stage Three or a High Development Level and one school is at a Stage Four or an Advanced Develop- ment Level;
• the Infrastructure — Networking Indicator, where 2 out of 6 or 33% are characterized as at a Stage Three or a High Development Level;
• the Technical Support Indicator, where 3 out of 6 or 50% are characterized as at a Stage Three (High) or a Stage Four (Advanced) Level; and
• the Professional Development Indicator, where 2 out of 6 or 33% are characterized as at a
Stage Three or a High Development Level.
!
128