Page 441 - The Principle of Economics

CHAPTER 20 INCOME INEQUALITY AND POVERTY 449
IN THE NEWS
A Rawlsian Billionaire
INVESTOR WARREN BUFFETT’S $36 BILLION make him one of the world’s richest men. Here is how Buffett explained his personal philosophy to an audi- ence of college students at the Univer- sity of Washington. He is responding to a question about the importance of “giving back to your community.” Notice the echoes of Rawls’s veil of ignorance.
Buffett’s Answer
I know in my own case that 99%-plus [of my wealth] will go back to society, just because we’ve been treated extraordi- narily well by society.
I’m lucky. I don’t run fast, but I’m wired in a particular way that I thrive in a big capitalist economy with a lot of ac- tion....IfIhadbeenbornsometime ago I would’ve been some animal’s lunch. . . .
Let me suggest another way to think about this. Let’s say that it was 24 hours before you were born, and a genie appeared and said, “You look like a win- ner. I have enormous confidence in you, and what I’m going to do is let you set the rules for society into which you will be born. You can set the economic rules and the social rules, and whatever rules
you set will apply during your lifetime and your children’s lifetime.”
And you’ll say, “Well, that’s nice, but what’s the catch?”
And the genie says, “Here’s the catch. You don’t know if you’re going to be born rich or poor, black or white, male or female, able-bodied or infirm, intelli- gent or retarded.” So all you know is that you’re going to get one ball out of a barrel with, say, 5.8 billion balls in it [each ball representing one of the 5.8 billion people on earth]. You’re going to partici- pate in what I call the ovarian lottery. It’s the most important thing that will happen to you in your life, but you have no con- trol over it. It’s going to determine far more than your grades at school or any- thing else that happens to you.
Now, what rules do you want to have? I’m not going to tell you the rules, and nobody will tell you; you have to make them up for yourself. But they will affect how you think about what you do in your will and things of that sort.
You’re going to want to have a sys- tem that turns out more and more goods and services. You’ve got a great quantity of people out there, and you want them to live pretty well, and you want your kids to live better than you did, and you want your grandchildren to live better than your kids. You’re going to want a system that keeps Bill Gates and Andy Grove and Jack Welch [heads of Mi- crosoft, Intel, and General Electric] work- ing long, long after they don’t need to work. You’re going to want the most able people working more than 12 hours a day. So you’ve got to have a system that gives them an incentive to turn out the goods and services.
But you’re also going to want a system that takes care of the bad balls, the ones that aren’t lucky. If you have a
WARREN BUFFETT
system that is turning out enough goods and services, you can take care of them. You don’t want people worrying about be- ing sick in their old age, or fearful about going home at night. You want a system where people are free of fear to some extent.
So you’ll try to design something, assuming you have the goods and ser- vices to solve that sort of thing. You’ll want equality of opportunity—namely a good public school system—to make you feel that every piece of talent out there will get the same shot at contribut- ing. And your tax system will follow from your reasoning on that. And what you do with the money you make is another thing to think about. As you work through that, everybody comes up with something a little different. I just suggest that you play that little game.
SOURCE: Fortune, July 20, 1998, pp. 62–64.