Page 358 - English - Teaching Academic Esl Writing

344 REFERENCES
Hyland,K.(1996).Talkingtotheacademy:Formsofhedging inscienceresearch ar- ticles. Written Communication, 13, 251-281.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-120). Lon- don: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2002a). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow, Essex: Longman. Hyland, K. (2002b). Authority and invisibility in academic writing. Journal of
Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students'
writing.Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183-205.
Indrasuta, C. (1988). Narrative styles in the writing of Thai and American students.
In A. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric
(pp. 206-227). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Institute of International Education. (2001). Open doors New York: Author.
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use. London: Longman.
Johns, A.(1981).NecessaryEnglish:Afaculty survey.TESOL Quarterly, 15(1),51-57. Johns, A. (1990a). L1 composition theories: Implications for developing theories
for L2 composition. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing (pp. 24-36). Cam-
bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A. (1990b). Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Employing ethnographic
principles in the academic milieu. In U. Connor & A.Johns (Eds.), Coherence in
writing (pp. 211-225). Alexandria, VA:TESOL.
Johns, A. (1991). Faculty assessment of ESL student literacy skills: Implications for
writing assessment. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing (pp. 167-180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Johns, A. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A., & Dudley-Evans, T (1991). English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 297-314.
Johnson, D. (1989a). Enriching task contexts for second language writing: Power through interpersonal roles. In D.Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing (pp. 39-54). New York: Longman.
Johnson, D. (1989b). Politeness strategies in L2 written discourse .Journal of Intensive English Studies, 3, 71-91.
Johnson, P.(1988). English language proficiency and academic performance of un- dergraduate international students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 164-168.
Johnstone, B. (1989). Linguistic strategies and cultural styles for persuasive dis- course. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Language,communication, and culture (pp. 139-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jones, C. (1985). Problems with monitor use in second language composing. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing-pro- cessproblems (pp. 96-118). New York: Guilford.
Jordan, R. (1997). Englishfor academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jourdenais, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction and protocol analysis.In P.Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 354-376). Cambridge: Cam- bridge UniversityPress.
Kachru, Y. (1999). Culture, context, and writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second lan- guage teaching and learning (pp. 75-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TLFeBOOK