Page 3 - APPENDIX_00_PREFIX 1-17
P. 3

-3-
until Mrs Hillgarth’s email request on 17 December 2015. That is a date 17 days outside of the statutory 6 months available to her under the terms of her lease and under the terms of the statute as you are more than well aware.
Is that disputed, if so please substantiate? Mrs Hillgarth’s references to requests from other lessees is totally unsubstantiated, totally untrue and proof perfect typical of her misinformed [and disproven] accusations to date. I am more than willing to accept proof of any previous request made by any lessee for invoices relating to our YE2014 Service Charge Accounts (or indeed any other set of Service Charge accounts, 2012 - 2015). I am not, though, willing to accept alleged erroneous eferences to supposed requests without evidence, be that telephone recorded or email correspon- dence. (Folder_00 Item_11)
(k)_in a drafT/PfCB/12 July 2016 To: City of London Police and National Fraud Crime Reporting Centre drawn up by “mH’s” Solicitor, he writes under Section (C) The 2014 refurbishment, Section 20, and mHml’s undisclosed charges Clause 11:
Amonst a multitude of other failings (described at some length in a letter from Mr Begg [“MH’s” solic- itor] to Mr Brown-Constable dated 23 March 2016, MHML has failed to provide the leaseholders of Mitre House with a proper summary of the service charge account (such as to clarify who was paid how much and for doing what in relation to the refurbishment project) or to allow access to inspect invoices and supporting documents. (Folder_00 Item_12)
(l)_and again under Clause 15: Not only Mrs Hillgarth (on 10 and 15 December 2015), but other leaseholders including Diego Fortunati from Flat 9 (on 17 and 21 December 2015) and Christopher Leigh Pemberton from Flat 8 (since May 2015) all pressed Mr Brown-Constable, without success, to provide relevant details of the refurbishment work carried out and a proper breakdown of the "reserves utilised" figure. (Folder_00 Item_13)
(m)_ [Please note our response attached to this drafT/PfCB/12 July 2016], namely: See my letters 1 and 8 August for further clarification - if I have answered this once I’ve answered it a dozen times with evidence to totally dispute your statement. We received a request from Mrs Hillgarth on 10th (and replied to) and 17 December 2015 (and replied to), a year after the works were finished (December 2014) requesting the information you refer to.
Diego Fortunati from Flat 9 (on 17 and 21 December 2015) wasn’t requesting documents but complaining of Agents’ fees and was comprehensively replied to [with document to substantiate]
Nobody including Mrs Hillgarth queried Reserves Utilised. In fact nobody queried our 2014 accounts until it was raised in your 23 March 2016 letter. Mrs Hillgarth never mentioned Reserves Utilised, only the invoices relevant to the works in 2014 (on 17 December 2015).
I had asked you to supply me with correspondence allegedly sent by Mr Leigh Pemberton to me requesting information regarding accounts (since May 2015) as I have none on file exactly as previ- ously explained in correspondence. This is just another vacuous unsubstantiated accusation which I previously made clear is untrue. Please supply your evidence or desist from repeating unsubstanti- ated untruths.
My reply to Mrs Hillgarth on 17 December 2015 made clear it was close to Christmas and I’ll be back in form by New Year. I also explained that her request was somewhat out of time re statutory 6 months of our accounts (dated 30 May 2015) but I did not refuse her, simply stating I was recuperat- ing till New Year. She did not acknowledge my reply which to be fair was expected, predictable and in keeping with previous demands. (Folder_00 Item_14)
(n)_in a letter from “PBC” dated 1 august 2016 to “mH’s” Solicitor he writes: I also refer to your para (150 on the drafT/PfCB/12 July 2016 “.....Christopher Lee Pemberton from Flat 8 (since May 2015) ....pressed Mr Brown-Constable, without success, to provide relevant details of the refurbishment work carried out and a proper breakdown of the "reserves utilised" figure”. (Your reference to Mr Fortunati was denied and disproved with evidence).


































































































   1   2   3   4   5