Page 186 - NEW FINAL 616 BIG BAD BEGG

-28-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
THEIR CHOICE OF WADE!!!! BUT NO WAY WOULD ANY AGREE IN WRITING TO FUND BY MAKING SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS...!
And on receipt of the Minutes to the 23 May 2014 Board Meeting she replied on 6 June 2014:
I would like it registered that the estimates provided are not “like for like” in my opinion, for example Wade has included several things such as lighting etc. which are not provided in some of the other quotes including the quote from A&R Lawrence.
Regarding paragraph/point 3, I confirm that I will write to all the tenants of Mitre House to notify them that the contractors appointed by management is A& R Lawrence (of course once you confirm that this has indeed gone ahead [comment: meaning what - how can it go ahead until an- nounced????], and also once I have received all the requested documents above -
including an amended copy of the minutes according to my points for alteration above) in line with management’s obligation to appoint the lowest quote. [comment: contrary unhelpful etc]
Her comment that: “I would like it registered that the estimates provided are not “like for like” in my opinion, for example Wade has included several things such as lighting etc. which are not provided in some of the other quotes including the quote from A&R Lawrence” simply further
evidences her ineptitude and incompetence as WADE’S FINAL TENDER DID NOT
INCLUDE LIGHTING AND NO OTHER TENDERS INCLUDED LIGHTING as they were part of the unaffordables to be funded from savings - she was muddling her initial two Wade quotes way back in 2012/13 which included lighting but she denied sourcing and you
now accuse me of being party to - totally wrong as proved later in this tôme.
To which I replied by return responding to her comments - see below my replies in bold)
From: Michel Hillgarth <Michele@HillgarthArt.com> Subject: Minutes
Date: 6 June 2014 18:19:59 BST
To: Segar Karupiah <segar_9@hotmail.com>
Cc: Paul Constable <studio@graffiti.biz>, Jamil Raja <J.Raja@jraja.co.uk>, <mhillgarth@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <MHillgarth@GMail.com>
Dear Segar,
Thank you very much for sending the copy of the minutes for the meeting that was held on 23rd May 2014 at 12.00pm.
Firstly, please add into the minutes the below points:
- Paul charges a fee of £7.00 per day for his attendance at Mitre House. As far as I am aware this has never been approved at a board meeting, and there is no record or documentation to state otherwise. Until this has been agreed this charge should be suspended.
Reference Minutes From 25th August 2011 (Item 17) - in the absence of any director, a major- ity (quorum) can proceed with decisions. Does Ms Hillgarth consider £7 a day
excessive (or for an average 12 hour day, £1.71 an hour).
- The acknowledgement that the instructions given to the surveyor by PCB were verbal.
As discussed at Meeting, they were not only verbal, they were by email (and a meeting) as evidenced by Surveyors letter dated 13 December 2013 of which you received copies, twice.
PLEaSE rEFEr to variouS attaCHED “PDF/FuRtheR ReFeRenCes” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt