Page 54 - D-Day 6-6-17

Sent: 06 June 2017 11:31
To: Bruce R. Maunder Taylor <brmt@maundertaylor.co.uk>
Cc: Burrow Jillian <Jillian.Burrow@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>; Leoni-SceK Maria <mleonisceK@gmail.com>; Leigh-Pemberton Christopher <clp@sw12group.com>
Subject: MITRE HOUSE SW3 LON/00AW/LAM/2017/0011 BRMT / CHC
Dear Mr. Maunder Taylor,
Thank you for your two emails this morning.
You do seem intent on prolonging the situaKon with somewhat unfair innuendos and threats. We have not refused to comply with requests as is well established to date. We have only “objected” to your applicaKon for disclosure for accounts informaKon etc for 2014 to date (ie 2014, 2015, 2016 and to June 2017). As explained in our lejer to Ms Burrow of 4 June your s22 NoKce makes quite clear the 2014 Accounts are contested, queried etc and indeed the iniKally requested invoices (which we offered to send) only refer to the 2014 works’ programme. Surely we are enKtled to make those observaKons as fair comment, as expecKng us to also supply all accounts 2014 to date was not and never was an issue raised in the s22 NoKce. Can’t we simply get on with points raised in the s22 NoKce and get those out of the way before enlarging the paperwork in an unfair ajempt at discrediKng ourselves yet further. We’re in enough trouble as it is!
As regards the Management Plan comments. To be fair, we are only expecKng the CV & Fees as outlined on the iniKal direcKons. Surely no Management Plan re: clean sheet or whatever can be drawn up unKl such Kme as the Tribunal makes an appointment at which Kme quite obviously you will have everything we have to draw up your plan. In the meanKme I think, I hope, we are enKtled to have an idea of fees etc.
You seem somewhat reKcent in acknowledging the various documents already supplied to you which do evidence in detail our objecKons and reasons to unfair irrelevant requests and demands which would appear you are ajempKng to take an unfair advantage over our admijedly limited experience of the Tribunal’s protocols - but no admijance of poor management. We’ve more than disproved that alleged misdemeanour.
Thank you for confirming re: our bundle etc.
And whilst replying to your emails I would welcome your kind advice on the following situaKon which I make with memories of Mrs Hillgarth’s previous RTM applicaKon.
Normally at his Kme we would be issuing the June Quarterly Demands (due 25 June 2017) for £750 for each lessee.
Due to the impending Tribunal hearing on 26 and 27 June, I do not wish to appear to be doing anything that might be considered pre-empKve or nefarious, as indeed during the RTM fiasco, we were sternly advised by Mrs