Page 590 - FINAL MASTER 616pp 20-6-19 SOUND

-13-
in THe WesT London CoUnTY CoUrT - Case No: [ ]
Mrs MiCHeLe HiLLGArTH - Claimant
versus
MiTre HoUse MAnAGeMenT LiMiTed - First Defendant and
pAUL BroWn-ConsTABLe - Second Defendant
and
seGAr KArUpiAH - Third Defendant
and
JAMiL rAJA - Fourth Defendant __________________________________________________________________________________
pArTiCULArs oF CLAiM
__________________________________________________________________________________
Comment: ambiguous and irrelevant simply in pursuit of your shaky argument - i should have answered as is obvious from previous and subsequent correspondence “MHML charged/in- voiced the Service Charge £15,572.85 for progressing all the “unaffordables” from sav- ings of £31,756.21 made as agreed by Mrs Hillgarth to be attempted to be made (savings) at the 23 May 2014 Board Meeting” TrUe oF FALse?
Your query was: assuming the total expenditure figure of £105,877 per the Service Charge accounts is correct, the total amounts paid to contractors other than the surveyor and ar lawrence should add up to £33,354. if they do not, please explain why not.
My answer was: The £105,877 figure includes (your Witness Statement anomaly of non pay- ment/refusing to pay) £1590 due to ar lawrence once final snagging is accomplished, plus £31,765.21additional workings funded from savings made as described. again, full transparency of total cost of all works and fees to all lessees including myself and my fellow directors.
Comment: Now count up how many computations you have sent since 21 June 2016 quite obviously not having a clue of the above explanation, but focusing solely on a ruddy typo!!!!
Somewhat reminiscent of my references to discounts received which you seemed oblivious to and more recently seemingly only becoming cognizant of Water Tank & TV/Sky final costs despite dozens of references/discounts made and all in the 2014 Accounts sent to Maunder Taylor on 23 June 2017 some fifteen months ago.... as I said previously, you ain’t doing too well keeping up with events?
notes to the above to prove again your duplicity and incompetence seeing as these statements were made on 21 June 2016, three months after your 23 March 2016 letter and now two years ago... yet you’re still asking the very same questions (reserves Utilised ad nauseam with dozens of computations) and insisting MHML invoiced/charged the service Charge the full amount of the savings made of £31,756.21 (and kickin’ up a fuss because item (c) states £31,765.21 as opposed to £31,756.21 - how many times have you drawn attention to that typo? Must be close to a dozen to date...so let’s put this to bed for good and no more petty references to a typo nor “my admitting”...i didn’t..!
PleaSe reFer To aTTaCheD “AddendA/FUrTHer reFerenCes” iN SuPPorT oF argumeNT