Page 2 - 14_PBC to Begg_27-4-16 (9pp)

-2-
2c_namely: MHML did not advise, explain and both seek, and receive, all 9 lessees’ approval and agreement for a voluntary, but required to proceed with lessees’ works’ requests and budget, contribution of £2000 per lessee [as stated in the 22 June 2014 s.20] and made clear it was a strict necessity to have a 100% agreement from all 9 lessees or we could not legally proceed.
2d_namely: MHML did not advise, explain and both seek, and receive, all 9 lessees’ approval and agreement for a voluntary, but required to proceed, contribution of £867.87 per lessee for an urgently needed replacement Water Tank, and made clear a necessity to apply for an s.20 dispensation
if we could not get 100% agreement from all 9 lessees, which would take time [which we didn’t
have, as required scaffolding would not be in place resulting in a far higher cost at a later date [with dedicated scaffold] as well as the fact the tank itself was possibly dangerous and not fit for purpose - hence a dispensation request] We made clear a strict necessity to have a 100% agreement from all 9 lessees or we could not legally proceed without a required First Tier Tribunal (LVT) s.20 dispensation.
2e_namely: MHML did not advise, explain and both seek, and receive, all 9 lessees’ approval and agreement for a voluntary, but required to proceed, contribution of £593 per lessee for a communal TVSky install, and made clear it would be a necessity to instigate an s.20 set of Notices if we could not get 100% agreement from all 9 lessees, which would take time [which we didn’t have, as required scaffolding was a necessity to install into each flat]. We made clear a strict necessity to have a 100% agreement from all 9 lessees to both agree to wanting a communal system and to pay their voluntary share or we could not legally proceed under any circumstances, with or without an s.20 set of Notices.
2f_namely: MHML only charged Mrs Hillgarth for keys and no other lessees?
2g_namely: MHML only charged Mrs Hillgarth for additional TVSky works and no other lessees? 2h_namely: MHML did not post documents on our website as we stated we had ad nauseum?
2i_namely: MHML refused to recognise a supposed majority decision [when in fact there was none]. We would request on what basis this observation has been evaluated?
Please supply correspondence/emails [dated pre 31 December 2015] in support
2j_namely: MHML are disqualified in law to be both principal and agent in the particular circumstances of managing Mitre House?
Further statutory details please as our information is to the contrary as per our Head Lease
2k_namely: MHML are disqualified in law, by remaining both principal and agent in the particular circumstances of managing Mitre House, to charge fees and costs?
Further statutory details please as our information is to the contrary as per our Head Lease
*2l_namely: MHML progressed works outside of the scheduled works which the lessees did not want? We would request on what basis this observation has been evaluated?
Please supply correspondence/emails [dated pre 31 December 2015] in support
*2m_namely: MHML progressed works outside of the scheduled works which the lessees had not required/requested in correspondence?
We would request on what basis this observation has been evaluated?
Please supply correspondence/emails [dated pre 31 December 2015] in support
*2n_namely: MHML progressed works outside of the scheduled works which the lessees thought were being done by only the main contractor?
We would request on what basis this observation has been evaluated?
Please supply correspondence/emails [dated pre 31 December 2015] in support
2o_namely: MHML are considered by a majority to be unfit to manage, unpopular and unqualified We would request on what basis this observation has been evaluated?
Please supply correspondence/emails [dated pre 31 December 2015] in support
2p_namely: MHML are required to redecorate the interior to the lessees’ original majority vote request. We would request on what basis this observation has been evaluated?
Please supply correspondence/emails [dated pre 31 December 2015] in support