Page 3 - BEGG_ALL_MASTER flipped

7) Email dated 15 April 2014 - WADE
8) Email dated 15 May 2014 - WADE
9) Email dated 15 May 2014 - WADE
10) Email dated 16 May 2014 - WADE
11) Email dated 6 June 2014 - Minutes/Board Meeting queries from Mrs Hillgarth 12) Email dated 6 June 2014 - MHML’s reply - electrics/lightings/savings?
13) Detailed correctly issued final s.20 Notice dated 22 June 2014 - concurrent/incl. vat & fees? 14) Email dated 27 July 2014 re: lighting not included... paid how? Savings....?
15) Email dated 10 August 2014 to all lessees re: electrics - paid how? Savings....?
16) Email dated 21 August 2014 from Mrs Hillgarth re: electrics - paid how? Savings...?
17) Email dated 28 August 2014 to all lessees re: electrics - paid how? Savings....? 18) Email dated 11 September 2014 - savings in progress?
19) Email dated 13 September 2014 - savings in progress?
20) Email dated 27 October 2014 - a little light relief - alleged majority?
21) Email dated 19 October 2012 - alleged majority?
22abcdef) Accounts - check accounts - multiple
23) Email dated 20 November 2018 to all lessees - the truth to check?
24) Email dated 1 April 2015 - from Mrs Hillgarth - cheap, vulgar and unsuitable?
25) oh really? how was the lift refurb, emergency lighting and new electrics funded?
26) D-Day 8 June 2014 full analysis of Mrs Hillgarth’s contrarinesss 2011-2014
27) D-Day 20 June 2014 email end of the affair re: Mrs Hillgarth’s contrarinesss 2011-2014 28) Letter to all lessees dated 7 June 2017 - MHML have had enough...!
29) Email from PFC Begg 13 June 2017 denying Audio authenticity etc no music etc 30abc) Emails proving Mrs Hillgarth further contrarinesss
-3-
You will note attached to this covering letter are the following pdf references, all of which you have either been previously been supplied with, many on multiple previous occasions, or new refer- ences, along with relevant comment:
1) Letter dated 3 April 2016 to accompany requested documents - not sent due to you-know-why? 2) Correspondence from Surveyors Boyce Evens & Carpenter - re: savings and reduced works? 3) Email dated 9 June 2012 to all lessees re: voting - my work has finished?
4) Letter dated 8 July 2012 from Segar Karupiah (Director MHML) to Samya Riad re: vote rigging? 5) Letter dated 2 July 2013 from Emms Gilmore Liberson RTM Solicitors ref: Wade be contracted? 6) Detailed MHML invoice re: RTM
If there was any doubt concerning the veracity of above items, please advise and I will send further examples of each and any listed - the above items are simply examples of multiples on file.
Also attached for ease of referencing is your letter of 23 March 2016 with my comments attached refuting all accusations and innuendos which you’ll no doubt notice have not changed from those given in subsequent correspondence when you simply repeat the same accusations & innuendos.
Also attached along with many other relevant documentation at the end of this entire tôme is your client’s Witness Statement, again my with comments attached, which never saw the light of day thankfully for her as it sounds as though it was written by “The Mad Woman of Chaillot” which my responses to each of her observations evidence - leaving aside her classic admittance in para 73 that neither she nor any other lessee requested nor indeed were denied or ignored access to view YE2014 Accounts’ paperwork? And six pages (yes six) re: keys & police attendance?
Would seem your 23 March 2016 was based on lies and malicious innuendos?
Other references attached simply further evidence your client’s memory loss, dishonesty and malevolence directed at both MHML and myself in pursuit of her obvious vendetta to discredit MHML due to our insistence she comply with her lease covenants, desist in signing off tenancy agreements maintaining that all consents had been granted and requiring her resignation as a Di- rector of MHML subsequent to her progressing an RTM application to remove MHML to run Mitre House herself?
Not forgetting our invoice for time and costs in fielding her RTM fiasco which she ignored as usual.
If ever further proof be needed of your client’s contrarinesss I suggest you ask of her; “As a Director of MHML in 2014, how were you expecting the new lighting and electrics to be funded?” And subse-