Page 176 - OK THE REAL DEAL BEG 616pp NO SOUND

-10-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
can only be one of three answers which is one more that could be replied to “do you still beat your wife?” - and if unfamiliar, a No implies you did or Yes and you’re a busted flush.
Mrs Hillgarth is in the very same quandary? (a) within the tendered specifications & costed in (b) Don’t know and (c) from any savings made? Can’t wait to hear a fourth...!
As regards your “forensics” they are answered below as follows with those on your Supplementary Report to City of London Police and to The Insolvency Service responded to as attached:
In your letter of 19 January you request:
1. I would like you to clarify the invoice from Benitor of 9 June 2014 to clear and decorate the basement (which you were using at that time as your office) in the sum of £1,971, citing “flood dam- age”. There had been no mention in the specification or in Isaac’s report of flooding and this item had certainly not been agreed by the leaseholders. Who authorised this payment? Please confirm yes or no whether you stocked your own belongings in the basement, and yes or no whether you used the basement for your own convenience. ***
A Considered response: Whilst resurfacing Kings Road on 6 April 2014 RBK&C Highways dam- aged a Thames Water main which flooded all properties including basements within 50 yards either side of Mitre House with over two feet of dirty water and resulted in an Insurance Claim by MHML and the subsequent retaining of Benitor to make good for £1971.60
***No. No. Still awaiting those promised photos please?
2. Please clarify payments made in 2015 from MHML’s Lloyds Bank Account No: 23433668 to:
Ryszard Wajda £600 on 22 May £600 on 26 May
£750 on 2 June
£784.91 on 12 June
£44.52 on 15 June £35 on 16 June £1,200 on 24 June
Dimitar Dimitrov £400 on 3 July £600 on 10 July
£600 on 17 July
£480 on 24 July
£600 on 30 July £600 on 7 August £600 on 14 August £600 on 21 August £600 on 28 August
Who are these people? What services were provided by them? Who authorised these payments? I see no invoices for any of these payments and nor are these payments, so far as I can tell, picked up in the Service Charge Expense Detail Report for the year ended 31 December 2015.
A Considered response: Artisans employed by MHML and paid by MHML on a refurbishment proj- ect (Flat 7) having nothing to do with the Service Charge Expense Account (contrary to your client’s malicious rumour to all lessees that my Flat 7 was being refurbished in
September 2014 utilising our works’ contractor AR Lawrence and you make an absurdly great play of this typically scurrilous accusation in your 23 March 2016 letter attempting to add credibility to the lie as evidenced yet again by your more recent innuendo of a possible Benitor’s involvement requiring comment. Yes malicious. Another lie.
4. On several occasions in 2015 payments were unaccountably made by you into the MHML PLEaSE rEFEr to variouS attaCHED “PDF/FuRtheR ReFeRenCes” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt