Page 197 - OK THE REAL DEAL BEG 616pp NO SOUND

-29-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
- I would like it registered that the estimates provided are not “like for like” in my opinion, for example Wade has included several things such as lighting etc. which are not provided in some of the other quotes including the quote from A&R Lawrence. [AR Lawrence}
There are NO LIGHTS NOR ELECTRICS in either A&R Lawrence's tender, NOR INDEED ANY OF THE OTHER 5 TENDERS including WADE's - Wade DID QUOTE for some electrics & light- ing in their previous TWO quotes 3rd July 2012 and 23rd January 2013
As was proved CONCLUSIVELY at the meeting by Ms Hillgarth's inspection, ALL FIVE TEN- DER SPECIFICATIONS INCLUDING WADE's ARE 100% IDENTICAL
Regarding the second paragraph/point, referencing the question of additional contributions by all the lessees of Mitre House , I would suggest that another meeting is held in order how much and when such funds should be raised, and held to accommodate the attendance of all leasees i.e. with a suit- able period of notice and also allowing for any issues regarding a date that suits all.
Point 9 –
No need whatsoever, if we need additional funds they will be requested in future
Quarterly Demands. IT WAS all discussed at meeting on 23rd and quite straightforward - what is NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD is how Ms Hillgarth will explain to her virtual majority that having obstructed the INTERNALS since originally scheduled for September 2012 for £35,000 incl. VAT (to include lighting etc etc) and then argued Management's estimate of EXTERNALS for around £70,000 incl. vat (we HOPED, fingers crossed, a miracle if it's correct etc etc) - we are now DOING BOTH INTERNALS & EXTERNALS for £105,000 incl, VAT and fees which is EXACTLY as we budgeted for in £2012 (£35,000 plus £70,000 totals £105,000) but we wasted TWO years for nothing....!
Regarding paragraph/point 3, I confirm that I will write to all the tenants of Mitre House to notify them that the contractors appointed by management is A& R Lawrence (of course once you confirm that this has indeed gone ahead, and also once I have received all the requested documents above - including an amended copy of the minutes according to my points for alteration above) in line with management’s obligation to appoint the lowest quote.
I repeat.......what is NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD is how Ms Hillgarth will explain to her virtual majority that having obstructed the INTERNALS since originally scheduled for Sep- tember 2012 for £35,000 incl. VAT (to include lighting etc etc) and then argued Management's estimate of EXTERNALS for around £70,000 incl. vat (we HOPED, fingers crossed, a miracle if it's correct etc etc) - we are now DOING BOTH INTERNALS & EXTER- NALS for £105,000 incl, VAT which is EXACTLY as we budgeted for in £2012 (£35,000 plus £70,000 totals £105,000) but we wasted TWO years for nothing....!
Point 10 (Adjournment)
The meeting was adjourned at 18.45 and not 18.00. Please amend. TOTALLY AGREED....
Regards,
Michele
I WOULD FINALLY ADD -
This reply is thoroughly disappointing after a 7 hour BOARD MEETING on Friday 23rd May at which Michele was invited to request anything and as far as I'm concerned ALL her previous accusations, innuendos, complaints were answered in full with supporting paperwork. Any- thing that was not, was promised to be sent to her - IT ALL WAS despite her (as usual) denial of receipt.
PLEaSE rEFEr to variouS attaCHED “PDF/FuRtheR ReFeRenCes” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt