Page 284 - OK THE REAL DEAL BEG 616pp NO SOUND

-44-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
No, not forged or doctored and one hopes Mrs Hillgarth will recognise her own handwriting and re- call the comments she made including Mr Karupiah’s comment that she didn’t need to write every- thing down as all would be sent to her - which it was including all company documents since day one (2011) to date (May 2014) and all bank statements (copies) from day one (2011) to date (May 2014).
By the way, I was amused by your email to Maunder Taylor dated 19 May 2017 (ref: my standard diversionary tactic to date? Another fib as all I was doing was supplying the very same evi- dence to disprove your client’s fibs that you’d been supplied with but ignored?) but I’m sure you noted that I did not refer once to any of those 1000 pages in our defence bundle and neither did the ruddy court despite the fact that had I done so, each and every accusation thrown at myself and MHML would have been decimated but one thing was undeniable and to be fair to the Tribunal they hit it on the head in their decision namely: “relations between the Applicants and the Land- lord had irretrievably broken down”, something I’d have been an idiot to deny as it was true, much like Mrs Hillgarth denying the audio was stupid?
But no mention whatsoever of your silly petty untrue observations as regards fraud, blackmail, intim- idation, but simply “relations between the Applicants and the Landlord had irre-
trievably broken down”,the result of which was an increase in all leaseholders annual outgoings from £3000 to £10,000 within 12 months - that’s not even a pyrrhic victory; it’s
financial hari kari on the part of your client, Mrs Hillgarth, and I think I can be pretty certain that her three usual suspect donors were the very same cohorts she conned for the RTM fiasco and again conned for new agents - and you can bet your bottom dollar, if she has any left, that all three paid up well prior to getting our new Agents’ Quarterlies for £2500 as opposed to during the Tribunal hearing on 26 June 2017, they were £750 and dropping to £650 in 2018.
I bet they demanded their donations back...! Or sued Mrs Hillgarth for fraud & negligence?
I would add that she was quite satisfied with our banking arrangements and raised no concerns in her capacity as a fellow Director and the minutes show she was to be in receipt (and was) of all company documentation and Bank Statements since day one in two pdf files - and yes,
initially she denied receipt like so many other denied documentation and required resending
Our Surveyor’s Schedule of Works being a prime example - sent at least five times and
displayed prominently on our www.mitrehouse.com along with all other documents, correspon- dence, quotes, tenders, costings, budgets including those from MHML since late 2012. But mostly all denied by Mrs Hillgarth of firstly receiving and secondly of being all easily available on www.mitrehouse.com
Interestingly, both Mrs Hillgarth’s Witness Statement and Mr Leigh Pemberton’s of Flat 8 (sublet for 20 years to a sitting tenant, Mrs Lisa Cane, who has probably visited Mitre House on no more than a dozen times and I have never met him during the 50 years I have lived here but i do keep a close eye on his 85 year old sitting tenant (as on occasion he has requested I do) whom, due to her lease, he has no responsibility whatsoever for any of her expenses (boiler, pipeworks, electrics etc) in maintaining the property as one might expect for usual landlord/tenant, but not so with Mr Leigh Pemberton’s fragile tenant who’s rent he will no doubt attempt to raise following his voluntary agree- ment to a raise from £3000pa Service Charges during MHML’s tenure to now £10,000 under our new Agents.
Somwhat self inflicted as a result of allying himself with Mrs Hillgarth’s vendetta against myself and MHML, as both mention their dissatisfaction of the website’s navigability, content and use indicating they are either computer illiterate or simply in cahoots on Mrs Hillgarth’s usual modus operandi - ad- vising or indeed scripting documents she requests of lessees to conform to, as evidenced by what she did with Mr Tony White’s two Witness Statements when he advised me that “Michele wrote
it and I just signed it” in an email dated 15 June 2016
In fact not only did Mr White be required to edit and re-do his Witness Statement due to some ludi- crous errors (Water Tank, monies outstanding to electrician etc) but Mr Leigh Pemberton also sup- plied one dated 7 June 2017 maintaining “He continues to tell us that information is available
PLEaSE rEFEr to variouS attaCHED “PDF/FuRtheR ReFeRenCes” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt