Page 410 - FINAL MASTER 616pp 20-6-19

From: Paul B_C studio@graffiti.biz Subject: Fwd: Mitre House - response to email
Date: 14 June 2017 at 01:23
To: Peter Begg pbegg@tarsus.co.uk
Comment in RED BOLD Begin forwarded message:
!"#$%&!"#"$%&"''%()*"''+#,$-.-/01/.23
'()*+,-%&./%&01-"+&2#(3+&4&51-6#(-&7"+*(81,+
9:-+%&45%6.7"%894:%,#%85;<<;<5%&=>
;#%&?!,.@%&AB?%(-#.CD1+'$,EED#D/*DF3 <,%&G?6/H,I,+I$,I,/01/.2?G%(6/H,I,+I$,I,/01/.23J%G?-"',$AK+L1#M,D@/01M?G%(-"',$AK+L1#M,D@/01M3
Dear Mr Brown-Constable,
Thank you for your “Without Prejudice” e-mail of 13 June 2017 in which you ask me to “have a think” about the audio recording you have sent to myself (and others), which purports to be of your MHML board meeting of 23 May 2014.
I have thought about it. The general advice to those in a hole is normally to stop digging. However you seem to be digging a bigger and bigger hole for yourself with reckless disregard SEEMINGLY NOT AS WAS MADE CLEAR IN MY LETTER/EMAIL TO YOU OF 13 JUNE - READ IT AGAIN for the most basic requirements of the law.
You must be aware of the legal restraints on recording of conversations without consent SHE WAS GIVEN AMPLE OPORTUNITY TO DISSENT FROM EMAILS SENT TO HER FIRST ON 10 & 11 JUNE - AS EVER NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT since you refer in a separate e-mail of the same date to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. So you will be aware that you are not allowed to share this recording with anyone else without Mrs Hillgarth’s consent, which you do not have. You must also be aware that it is not admissible in court BUT A TRANSCRIPT IS AND WE HAVE THAT - AND IF YOU PROGRESS A COURT ACTION IN FULL KNOWLEDGE OF A LIE YOU SIR ARE AT RISK . Also, if MHML is storing personal information of this nature the company must be registered with the Data Protection Commissioner. (CHECK OUR WEBSITE FOR THAT AS WE HAD IT WHEN THE RECORDING WAS MADE)
What your recording purports to (PURPORTS - ARE YOU DEAF?) demonstrate is that Mrs Hillgarth was aware (AGREED TO - MAKING EVERYBODY HAPPY REMEMBER) on 23 May 2014 of the “savings” you were planning to make and of the “additional work” (HER WORKS AS WE REFER TO THEM AS) that you planned to carry out with the monies saved. In that case it seems surprising that in the official MHML minutes of that meeting it was recorded (at Mrs Hillgarth’s insistence) that the work was to be carried out exclusively (SHOW ME THE WORD
EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY MINUTES OR HER ADDITIONS) by AR Lawrence. And even more surprising that it was also recorded in the subsequent Section 20 letter of 22 June 2014 (accepted by all the leaseholders) that the work was to be
carried out exclusively (SHOW ME THE WORD EXCLUSIVELY IN ANY s20 NOTICE )by AR Lawrence.
There was no mention in those documents of yourself or MHML doing the work. In fact in an e-mail to you from Diego Fortunati dated 20 June 2014 timed at 01:01 he complained (WHAT TWO MONTHS PRIOR TO WORKS COMMENCING) at the lack of disclosure as to who would perform the actual work and made perfectly clear,