Page 493 - FINAL MASTER 616pp 20-6-19

-9-
SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT TO CITY OF LONDON POLICE
and to THE INSOLVENCY SERVICE
mitre house management limited (“mhml”) – company no: 07731341
mitre house, 124 King’s road, london sW3 4tP (“mitre house” or “the Property”) directors of mhml: Paul Brown-constable, dima international limited (Jamil raja) and segar Karupiah (resigned 29 september 2016) (together “the directors”).
of a&r lawrence. in effect that he was a sub-contractor of a&r lawrence, and that his per- sonal work was all part of their contract. this was plainly untrue and has been dismissed as nonsense by mr White of a&r lawrence in his Witness statement. see also the e-mail from mr isaacs on 2 april 2015 confirming that he was only engaged in relation to the work actually car- ried out by a&r lawrence (ie not in relation to any work carried out by mr Brown-constable, for which he accepted no responsibility).
A CONSIDERED RESPONSE: ALL AND ANY WORK BY ANYBODY THAT WAS EXECUTED AT MITRE HOUSE IN 2014 WAS UNDER THE EYE AND ATTENTION OF OUR SURVEYOR, OUR FREEHOLDER’S SURVEYOR,’S SURVEYOR AND THE SITE FOREMAN. HAD ANY WORKINGS BEEN OF A “SHODDY” OR “UNPROFESSIONAL” STANDARD THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO BE RECTIFIED MOST LIKELY BY ME AS PROJECT MANAGER ON BEHALF OF MHMLINCLUDINGANYWORKTHATIPERSONALLYPERFORMED.
IT WAS NOT DISMISSED AS NONSENSE BY MR WHITE AS HIS EMAIL TO ME DATED 15 JUNE 2016 MAKES CLEAR: “POSSIBLY A FURTHER STATEMENT AGREEING THAT THE OTHER WORKS DONE BY YOURSELF AND OTHERS WAS UP TO A GOOD STANDARD” AND ADVISING ME THAT YOUR CLIENT, MRS HILLGARTH, HAD ACTUALLY WRITTEN HIS WITNESS STATE- MENT AND HE “JUST SIGNED IT”. THE REASON NO DOUBT IT WAS FULL OF ERRORS?
THAT AT LEAST ANSWERS THE ERRORS IN THAT WITNESS STATEMENT SUCH AS AR LAWRENCE HAD INCLUDED THE WATER TANK IN THEIR TENDER, AND THAT MHML HAD AN OUTSTANDING INVOICE WITH OUR ELECTRICIANS, NIGEL BROOKS, AND INDEED WE WERE REFUSING TO PAY AR LAWRENCE THEIR COMPLETION FEE OF £1590.
ALLWERETOTALLYFABRICATEDANDPROVEDUNTRUESUBSEQUENTLY,RESULTINGINA NEW WITNESS STATEMENT PRESUMABLY YET AGAIN WRITTEN BY YOUR CLIENT? AND STILLCONTAININGERRORS.
WHEN MRS HILLGARTH’S WITNESS STATEMENT WAS PUBLISHED ON 11TH AUGUST 2016 IT TOO CONTAINED THE EXACT SAME ACCUSATIONS ALONGSIDE MANY OTHER INACCURA- CIES WHICH HAD ALL BEEN THOROUGHLY DISPUTED IN PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE MOST NOTABLY MY COMMENTS TO YOUR INITIAL LETTER OF 23 MARCH 2016 - AND NOT FOR- GETTINGMRSHILLGARTH’SADMITTANCEINPARA73STATINGTHATNOLESSEE INCLUDINGHERHADREQUESTEDDOCUMENTATIONFROMOURYE2014WITHINTHE PERMITTED PERIOD. THIS DESPITE YOUR LIBELLOUS ACCUSATIONS THAT WE HAD
IGNORED OR REFUSED YOUR CLIENT AND OTHER LESSEES ACCESS WHICH WAS REFERRED TO OUR FREEHOLDER’S SOLICITORS, MACFARLANES, AS WELL ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON HOUSING DEPT -
ALL OF WHOM ACCEPTED OUR DENIALS AND TOOK NO FURTHER INTEREST.
18. We also have a letter from mr isaacs to White dated 29 January 2015 (following practi- cal completion on 17 december 2014) further reducing the final contract sum for a&r lawrence to an agreed figure of £53,000 plus Vat. again this reduction was implemented without any ref- erence to the leaseholders, and without their knowledge or consent.
Please refer to attached “ADDENDUM/FURTHER REFERENCES” in suPPort of argument