Page 136 - xx10_BEGG_ALL_MASTER to Add to

PFC Begg Esq Solicitor
9th Floor
Metro Building
1 Butterwick Hammersmith London W6 8DL
Ref: Cover Letter
1 March 2019 - held over
Dear Mr. Begg,
pBc PAUL N. BROWN-CONSTABLE
DESIGN & PROJECT CONSULTANT
7 MITRE HOUSE • 124 KINGS ROAD • CHELSEA • LONDON SW3 4TP TELEPHONE +44 (0)20 7589 2764 • MBL +44 (0)798 33 33 543 EMAIL: PAULBROWNCONSTABLE@ME.COM
Thank you for your multiple and varied emails and letters most relevantly since 19 January 2019, one of which on 15 February suggesting, one presumes, that my full admission to all charges to date would be both cathartic and lift “an intolerable burden?”
I hope your client received the same advice?
It would still appear from all recent correspondence, leaving aside your most recent “forensic financial & personnel” investigations (ongoing), including your letters and notifications to Companies House, Registrar of Companies, and to MHML, Particulars of Claim in the West London County Court and Supplementary Report to City of London Police and to The Insolvency Service, that we are in an almost identical position as we were following my comprehensive answers to your initial thirteen page letter dated 23 March 2016?
In other words none of my explanations and denials with supporting evidence have sufficed.
I think it’s fair to assume your non “forensic financial & personnel” accusations remain as follows or at least the sensible ones as opposed to those I have referred to previously as “petty” such as blackmail, vote rigging, plagiarism etc which I appreciate you do not consider petty?
They aren’t petty, they’re ludicrous like most if not all of your client’s imaginative nonsense and all of your recent unimaginative interpretation of actual events - indicating you have no real understanding of facts presented to date by me in answer to your endless accusations as even your client, how- ever dishonest and driven, could not possibly have advised you of your recent faux-pas nonsense - further evidenced somewhere in this tŏme.
Examples of erroneous observations and totally untrue accusations answered ad nauseam to yet further repeated innuendoes ad nauseam are as follows in no particular date order - just facts to dis- prove your appraisals and prove your client’s poor memory and lack of integrity, disloyalty and downright dishonesty in pursuit of her vendetta against myself and MHML for insisting she properly comply with her lease obligations and desist in signing off tenancy agreements stating all consents had been requested and received.
Your letter of 23 March 2016 states incorrectly:
a) Mrs Hillgarth bought her flat in August 1985 (correct) and is the longest serving lease-
holder in Mitre House. (incorrect and misleading)
aa) I moved into Mitre House on 1st July 1968 as a sitting tenant with tenancy lease, purchasing my
flat outright in December 1985 giving me seniority of tenure.
PLEaSE rEFEr to variouS attaCHED “PDF/FuRtheR ReFeRenCes” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt