Page 476 - xx10_BEGG_ALL_MASTER to Add to

-5-
SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT TO CITY OF LONDON POLICE
and to THE INSOLVENCY SERVICE
mitre house management limited (“mhml”) – company no: 07731341
mitre house, 124 King’s road, london sW3 4tP (“mitre house” or “the Property”) directors of mhml: Paul Brown-constable, dima international limited (Jamil raja) and segar Karupiah (resigned 29 september 2016) (together “the directors”).
CONVENIENT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES TO MAKE THE ORDER TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO REGULARISE THE SHAREHOLDING OF THE COMPANY AND SEEK TO APPOINT NEW DIRECTORS. IT WAS CLEAR TO US THAT RELATIONS BETWEEN THE APPLICANTS (MRS HILLGARTH) AND THE LANDLORD (MHML) HAD IRRETRIEVABLY BROKEN DOWN.
NEVER WAS A TRUER WORD SPOKEN...! AND WE, MHML, TOTALLY AGREED.
IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT ON THREE OCCASIONS WELL PRIOR TO THE 26TH JUNE 2017 TRIBUNAL HEARING, MHML HAD OFFERED TO STEP ASIDE AND DONATE THE HEAD LEASE TO MRS HILLGARTH AS WE NO LONGER WISHED TO REPRESENT MITRE HOUSE NOR INDEED AFTER 2017 WOULD WE HAVE BEEN LEGALLY ENTITLED TO DO SO FOLLOW- ING UK GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRING MANAGING AGENTS TO HAVE SPECIFIED PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WHICH WE NEITHER HAD NOR WISHED TO OBTAIN.
AS REGARDS “LACK OF TRANSPARENCY” ON HOW FUNDS WERE SPENT DURING THE 2014 MAJOR WORKS”, THIS WAS ADMITTED AS TOTALLY UNTRUE IN MRS HILLGARTH’S OWN WITNESS STATEMENT (PARA 73) AND AT NO TIME WERE LESSEES DENIED ACCESS TO VIEW WHATEVER THEY MIGHT WISH TO VIEW REGARDING THE MAJOR WORKS PROGRAMME OF 2014 AND IN FACT WERE REQUESTED AND REMINDED TO DO SO ON THREE OCCASIONS DURING THE WORKS IN 2014.
8. the consent order of the first tier Property tribunal approved a settlement agreement which had been negotiated and agreed on behalf of mhml by Paul Brown-constable, who was at all material times and remains a director of mhml. until this point the two other directors had remained completely invisible, taking absolutely no part in the management, not replying to let- ters, and making abundantly clear that they had no interest in responding to the concerns of the leaseholders.
A CONSIDERED RESPONSE: THEY WERE BOTH PROFESSIONALLY EMPLOYED AND HAD MADE CLEAR TO MRS HILLGARTH THAT THEY WOULD NOT PANDER TO HER CONSTANT COMPLAINING, ACCUSATIONS AND DISLOYALTY. AS REGARDS “had no interest in responding to the concerns of the leaseholders” THIS AGAIN IS INFLAMMATORY AND UNTRUE AS THEY ONLY MADE CLEAR THEIR CONTEMPT AND DISQUIET OF MRS HILLGARTH AND BOTH WERE ALWAYS AVAILABLE FOR LEGITIMATE LEASEHOLDER CONCERNS AS WAS MYSELF, 24/7
9. segar Karupiah, who is a malaysian accountant, was formerly resident at mitre house (flat 2), but the flat is currently occupied by his daughter. he was a director of mhml until 29 september 2016, when he resigned as a director. it may be relevant to add that he has re- signed from 5 companies and has held 14 appointments at 14 different dissolved companies.
A CONSIDERED RESPONSE: IT IS NOT OCCUPIED BY HIS DAUGHTER NOR IS LET ON AIRBNB AS MRS HILLGARTH MALICIOUSLY ACCUSED HIM OF DOING DUE TO MHML NSISTENCE THAT MRS HILLGARTH COMPLY WITH HER LEASE COVENANTS WHILST SUBLET- TING AND DESIST IN SIGNING OFF HER TENANCY AGREEMENTS STATING THAT ALL CONSENTS HAD BEEN GRANTED - THEY HAD NOT BEEN BECAUSE THEY HAD NEVER
BEEN REQUESTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Please refer to attached “ADDENDUM/FURTHER REFERENCES” in suPPort of argument
.