Page 12 - The Big Begg_1

-12-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
proposed government legislation that from 2018 MHML would not be qualified to refer to our- selves as Managing Agents or act as ones without certain professional qualifications over and above common sense. Hence our offers to step aside and “no contest” at the Tribunal.
As I have oft' quoted, this affair is no more than your client’s vendetta against both myself and MHML due to our insistence that whilst a Director of MHML she should fully comply with her various lease covenants when sub-letting and to desist in signing off her various tenancy agree- ments stating that all consents have been granted. This was further aggravated by our refusal to accede to her financially impossible demand to retain her preferred contractor, Wade, (and she progressed an RTM whilst remaining a director of MHML in an attempt to to enforce Wade’s re- tention no matter the cost) for initially a £65,000 internals refurbishment as opposed to MHML’s £35,000 proposal which included almost identical workings, and she then was proved conclu- sively ga-ga when Wade quoted £219,000 for the exact same workings as our retained contrac- tor, AR Lawrence, quoted £105,019. This was finally aggravated when MHML insisted on her resignation as a Director in September 2014.
The more recent financial queries would now imply a “witch hunt” seeing as the audio recording of the 23 May 2014 Board Meeting has, whether you believe its contents or not, totally deci- mated your client’s lies and poor memory and appears to have taken a back seat whilst you now progress claims of financial impropriety on my part in purloining £29,000 from leaseholders, so making the initial scurrilous accusations outlined in your 23 March 2016 letter as irrelevant and untrue as I originally suggested they all were and proved they were, recording or no record- ing. Mr Karupiah remains suspiciously off your radar in requesting his confirmation of the veracity of the audio tape? Any reason WHY? If he drops dead or goes on the lamb I’m ?>&^..!
It’s also noted that since our new Agents, Maunder Taylor, took the reins, your client has made no query/comment/complaint on any subject concerning the like of which she constantly com- plained/queried/commented upon when MHML were in charge - and Maunder Taylor have progressed to date all processes which MHML progressed under fire from Mrs Hillgarth - just an observation to prove yet again Mrs Hillgarth’s malevolence, contrariness, obstinacy and disloyalty towards me and MHML as examples outlined in this tome well evidence?
Had MHML raised annual outgoings by 333% she’d have suffered a stroke and accused me of attempted murder. We raised annual outgoings by 33% in 2015 (from £2600 to £3600) and she organised a strike and refused to pay along with her allies, Flats 3, 8 and 9 refusing to pay and were all in receipt of a Solicitor’s letter costing the Service Charge £540
I’ll bet you a decent lunch neither she nor her allies have queried Maunder Taylor’s 333%.....
Please Note: Might I take this opportunity to advise those people with less interest in this affair than your good self to read no further, but in the interest of fact over fiction (as recently there has been much fiction in your correspondence; Meter Cupboards/Pigeon Boxes/Wade/PRS etc) I have prepared both a short summary (below) followed by a far more comprehensive account of what actually transpired at Mitre House since 2011 as opposed to the fictitious account relayed to you by your client so that both you and Mrs Hillgarth and indeed MHML and myself are all singin’ from the same song book!
For anybody unfamiliar, or indeed too familiar with this affair, here is a very brief history:
Following the purchase of the Head Lease of Mitre House in July 2011 by four lessees including Mrs Hillgarth, Mitre House Management Limited (MHML) was formed and acted as Manage- ment to run and maintain Mitre House economically (Mrs Hillgarth maintains it was only to protect our Reserves!). MHML immediately set a budget of £25,000, a Surveyor’ Schedule of Internals’ Works for a mid 2012 date to progress an Internals refurbishment (well overdue along with Externals as per Head Lease covenants) and set about gathering two or three quotes from each of various individual contractors as opposed to one main contractor in the interest of maxi-
PLEaSE rEFEr to attaCHED “ADDENDA/FURTHER REFERENCES” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt