Page 41 - The Big Begg_1

I bet they demanded their donations back...! Or sued Mrs Hillgarth for fraud & negligence?
-41-
“HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?”
No, not forged or doctored and one hopes Mrs Hillgarth will recognise her own handwriting and recall the comments she made including Mr Karupiah’s comment that she didn’t need to write everything down as all would be sent to her - which it was including all company documents since day one (2011) to date (May 2014) and all bank statements (copies) from day one (2011) to date (May 2014).
By the way, I was amused by your email to Maunder Taylor dated 19 May 2017 (ref: my stan- dard diversionary tactic to date? Another fib as all I was doing was supplying the very same evidence to disprove your client’s fibs that you’d been supplied with but ignored?) but I’m sure you noted that I did not refer once to any of those 1000 pages in our defence bun- dle and neither did the ruddy court despite the fact that had I done so, each and every accusa- tion thrown at myself and MHML would have been decimated but one thing was undeniable and to be fair to the Tribunal they hit it on the head in their decision namely: “relations between the Applicants and the Landlord had irretrievably broken down”, something I’d have been an idiot to deny as it was true, much like Mrs Hillgarth denying the audio was stupid?
But no mention whatsoever of your silly petty untrue observations as regards fraud, blackmail, intimidation, but simply “relations between the Applicants and the Landlord had
irretrievably broken down”,the result of which was an increase in all leaseholders an- nual outgoings from £3000 to £10,000 within 12 months - that’s not even a pyrrhic victory; it’s financial hari kari on the part of your client, Mrs Hillgarth, and I think I can be pretty certain that her three usual suspect donors were the very same cohorts she conned for the RTM fiasco and again conned for new agents - and you can bet your bottom dollar, if she has any left, that all three paid up well prior to getting our new Agents’ Quarterlies for £2500 as opposed to during the Tribunal hearing on 26 June 2017, they were £750 and dropping to £650 in 2018.
I would add that she was quite satisfied with our banking arrangements and raised no concerns in her capacity as a fellow Director and the minutes show she was to be in receipt (and was) of all company documentation and Bank Statements since day one in two pdf files - and yes, initially she denied receipt like so many other denied documentation and required resending
Our Surveyor’s Schedule of Works being a prime example - sent at least five times and displayed prominently on our www.mitrehouse.com along with all other documents, correspon- dence, quotes, tenders, costings, budgets including those from MHML since late 2012. But mostly all denied by Mrs Hillgarth of firstly receiving and secondly of being all easily available on www.mitrehouse.com
Interestingly, both Mrs Hillgarth’s Witness Statement and Mr Leigh Pemberton’s of Flat 8 (sublet for 20 years to a sitting tenant, Mrs Lisa Cane, who has probably visited Mitre House on no more than a dozen times and I have never met him during the 50 years I have lived here but i do keep a close eye on his 85 year old sitting tenant (as on occasion he has requested I do) whom, due to her lease, he has no responsibility whatsoever for any of her expenses (boiler, pipeworks, electrics etc) in maintaining the property as one might expect for usual landlord/ten- ant, but not so with Mr Leigh Pemberton’s fragile tenant who’s rent he will no doubt attempt to raise following his voluntary agreement to a raise from £3000pa Service Charges during MHML’s tenure to now £10,000 under our new Agents.
Somwhat self inflicted as a result of allying himself with Mrs Hillgarth’s vendetta against myself and MHML, as both mention their dissatisfaction of the website’s navigability, content and use indicating they are either computer illiterate or simply in cahoots on Mrs Hillgarth’s usual modus operandi - advising or indeed scripting documents she requests of lessees to conform to, as evi- denced by what she did with Mr Tony White’s two Witness Statements when he advised me that “Michele wrote it and I just signed it” in an email dated 15 June 2016
PLEaSE rEFEr to attaCHED “ADDENDA/FURTHER REFERENCES” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt