Page 192 - FINAL MASTER 616pp 20-6-19 SOUND

-22- “HOW DID YOU THINK MHML WERE FUNDING THE NEW LIGHTING?” This was in response to an email I sent to all leaseholders on 31 December 2018 which does bring all above into focus as regards what the actual facts are and how the truth can be very easily ascer- tained. Reproduced on following page. Consequently I consider your Statement of Truth signing off on your “Particulars of Claim”, namely: “I believe and the Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true and I am duly authorized \[authorised surely\] by the Claimant to sign this statement.” I consider that to be totally unacceptable and rank dishonesty given the evidence supplied to you to date, if not on all accounts \[outstanding recent queries\], but without a shadow of doubt on all others most pertinently when the “audio” is referenced, “doctored” or not with Mr Segar Karupiah as a prime witness whom you appear reticent to gain confirmation from? Let’s repeat a particularly pathetic accusation of Mrs Hillgarth that MHML were running an office from the basement and you supplied this photograph as evidence? This accusation is typical of all her’s and your accusations to date having no merit nor veracity whatsoever and if I re- call both you and Mrs Hillgarth have made numerous references to this “basement bureau” including in her Witness Statement and at the First Tier Tribunal - it’s just another lie, isn’t it? PLEaSE rEFEr to variouS attaCHED “PDF/FuRtheR ReFeRenCes” in SuPPort oF arguMEnt