Page 593 - FINAL MASTER 616pp 20-6-19 SOUND

-16- in THe WesT London CoUnTY CoUrT - Case No: \[ \] Mrs MiCHeLe HiLLGArTH - Claimant versus MiTre HoUse MAnAGeMenT LiMiTed - First Defendant and pAUL BroWn-ConsTABLe - Second Defendant and seGAr KArUpiAH - Third Defendant and JAMiL rAJA - Fourth Defendant __________________________________________________________________________________ pArTiCULArs oF CLAiM __________________________________________________________________________________ overall amount of £105,877 charged to the service charge reserves £105,877 Claimant’s one ninth share of £105,877 £11,764 less £250 statutory cap (£250) reimbursement claimed £11,514 (B) Claim for damages for breach and/or repudiation of contract by the defendants 38. The principal ground for the Claimant’s application for a change of management at mitre house was fraud on the part of the Defendants, including false accounting. however the First- Tier Property Tribunal being a cost-neutral forum, the Claimant was unable to recover the legal costs and expenses incurred by her in her successful prosecution of her claim for a change of management at mitre house. 39. Furthermore, by reason of the repudiation of the settlement agreement referred to in para- graph 13 above, the Claimant incurred additional fees and expenses which would not have been incurred had the terms of the said settlement agreement been observed, namely: (a) in the establishment of a new company, mitre house management Company (2017) lim- ited; and (b) in changing the articles of association of the said new company as appropriate on profes- sional advice; and (c) in appointing directors to the said new company; and (d) in the issue of new shares in the said new company to all the leaseholders at mitre house; and (e) in the transfer by conveyancing solicitors of the head lease to the said new company. 40. accordingly the Claimant now seeks reimbursement of the sums incurred by her to pursue the proceedings in the First-Tier Property Tribunal as well as the additional costs and losses in- curred by her by reason of the repudiation of the settlement agreement, as follows: pArTiCULArs oF Loss Fees paid to (Bruce) maunder Taylor re preparation of Section 24 application Fees paid to (Bruce) maunder Taylor re inspection of mitre house and preparation of draft management order Fees paid to (Bruce) maunder Taylor re preparation for and attendance £1,570 £1,440 at Tribunal, and at a settlement meeting with mr Brown-Constable , and subsequent consultation re company matters and re-organisation. Fees paid to (michael) maunder Taylor for attendance at Tribunal Fees paid to SrJ accounting Services ltd (per maunder Taylor) for setting up new company and issuing new shares to the leaseholders £11,819 £720 Total paid by Claimant £300 £15,849 less recoveries by voluntary contributions from three leaseholders (£7,055) net costs incurred and paid by Claimant PleaSe reFer To aTTaCheD “AddendA/FUrTHer reFerenCes” iN SuPPorT oF argumeNT £8,794