Page 596 - FINAL MASTER 616pp 20-6-19 SOUND

-19- in THe WesT London CoUnTY CoUrT - Case No: \[ \] Mrs MiCHeLe HiLLGArTH - Claimant versus MiTre HoUse MAnAGeMenT LiMiTed - First Defendant and pAUL BroWn-ConsTABLe - Second Defendant and seGAr KArUpiAH - Third Defendant and JAMiL rAJA - Fourth Defendant __________________________________________________________________________________ (a) compensation and/or reimbursement founded on statute, and damages based on fraudulent misrepresentation, as itemised in Section (a) above, in the amount of (b) damages for breach and/or repudiation of contract by the Defendants as referred to in Section (B) above, in the amount of: (c) damages for conversion and based on the Defendants’ breach 11,514 8,794 3,500 of statutory duty as referred to in Section (C) above, in the amount of: (d) damages in tort for deceit, to be assessed as referred to in Section (D) above: TBa (e) interest at the rate of 8% on the sums referred to in paragraphs (a), (b),(c) and (d) above from the date of issue of this Claim until judgment pArTiCULArs oF CLAiM __________________________________________________________________________________ or sooner payment, pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts act 1984. TBa ToTAL 25,000 all to be awarded against the Second Third and Fourth Defendants in their personal capacities and in such proportions as the Court may determine. 33. The value of this action exceeds £5,000, but does not exceed £25,000. i believe and the Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true and i am duly authorized by the Claimant to sign this statement. A Considered response: i Consider THe ABove sTATeMenT To Be disHonesT And LiBeLLoUs Given THe evidenCe sUppLied To dATe WHiCH inConTroverTiBLY dis- proves ALL ACCUsATions And innUendos . statement of Truth ...................................................... P.F.C.Begg Solicitor ...and don’t forget? Mrs Hillgarth wrote in an email sent to all lessees on 21 August 2014: PleaSe reFer To aTTaCheD “AddendA/FUrTHer reFerenCes” iN SuPPorT oF argumeNT