Page 140 - V4
P. 140

Sefer Chafetz Chayim                  םייח ץפח רפס                                                                                                                            5 VOL-4
 Hilchot Esurei Rechilut            תוליכר ירוסיא תוכלה
 Kelal Beit  -  Halachah 3             אי הכלה -  א ללכ


 him about Rav as being a superlative and he would have had no complaints   םייח םימ ראב
 at  all  against  this  decision.    (In  a  parallel  sense,  Rabbeinu Y.  Braunah
 (section #38) answered a question in Gemara Shabbat (127b) regarding    'ר יבתכ יכיה בתכמ ).'ל( ןירדהנסמ .בתכמ )כ(
 how Rebbe Yehoshua could seemingly have brought himself to point of
 being suspect).  But for men of ordinary status, responding as these rabbis   .ליכר ךלת אל םושמ יאכז רמא ןנחוי
 did would be forbidden.  It is possible that this situation is conditional on
 whether or not the speaker would have been willing to make his comments
 directly in the presence of “Plony.” (For example, Reuven says to Shimon
 – “Levi said such-and-such about you.”  In this example, Levi is “Plony,”
 nd
 the initiator of the remark).  Please see above (in the 2  Kelal of the Laws
 of Esurei Lashon Hara) the discussion in the Be’er Mayim Chayim where
 we explained the opinion of the Tosafot  (regarding the leniency of  “in the
 presence of three people,” and how and when it can be applied.)




 Daily Halacha: 29 Kislev, 29 Nissan, 29 Av;   Leap Year- 6 Tevet, 16 Nissan, 26 Av
 th
 If the month of Kislev has only 29 days, then the learning for the 30  day is incorportated into the 29
 th
 day
 Mekor Hachayim

 RK2/3. There is an opinion that holds if an individual spoke (4)
 disparagingly  (5)  about  his  fellow  Jew  in  the  presence  of  three
 people, those remarks would be immune from the esur of Rechilut
 if these three people in-turn conveyed those remarks to the “victim,”
 and told him that “Plony” said such-and-such about you. (According
 to this opinion) The reason for exempting the speaker from the esur
 of Rechilut is because remarks presented in this way will inevitably
 reach back to the victim, that one person tells another person who
 in  turn  tells  another  until  it  reaches  the  victim  and  this  type  of
 information transfer was never forbidden by the Torah.  But this
 speaker must be very careful to conform to the rules explained above
 nd
 in the Laws of Esurei Lashon Hara, in the 2  Kelal, beginning with
 the 4  halacha onward.  However, in a practical sense one may not
 th
 rely on this leniency because the Maharshal in his commentary on
 the Se’Mag wrote that many of our Early Authorities (namely the
 Rambam, the Se’Mag and the Tosafot) disagree with this opinion
 and completely forbid it in all circumstances, even to say this to




 139                                                                             130
 volume 4                                                                     volume 4
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145