Page 165 - VOL-2
P. 165

Sefer Chafetz Chayim
                                    Hilchot Esurei Lashon Hara

                                            Kelal Dalet - Halachah 4

               did so unintentionally, the applicable law for this person will be explained
               below in 7th halacha of this Kelal. (Please see that reference).

             (4/3/3)-(11) .. or that he did not know: Apart from what I wrote

               above, that the basis for this law evolves from Rabbeinu Yonah, it is also
               found in Shulchan Aruch Chosen Mishpat section #34 paragraph #24
               (please see that reference) regarding qualities that would disqualify a
              person from being a witness, that this person would not be disqualified
               as a witness for this reason because we can assume he did not know the
               action he performed was a sin. And certainly regarding this discussion of
               Lashon Hara this is true, as explained by the Chavot Yair in section #62
               where he states that that the law is significantly more stringent regarding
               the qualifications to be a witness. (Please see that reference).

             (4/3/4)-(12) ..even someone who saw him: Meaning two people,

               because if only one person saw this person, disclosure would in any
               case be forbidden, as will be explained in the following halacha. And
               that which I wrote above “transgresses this law several times” is evident
               from Rabbeinu Yonah’s Shaare Teshuvah in section #219 that disclosure
               is not permitted even when this person committed this sin several times
               except in an instance where all of Jewish society knows that this action is
               a sin. (Please reference that citation). Notwithstanding this, this law is
               obvious.

                                           Mekor Hachayim

            K4/4. However, if it is apparent to them (13) that this sinner knew

              that what he was doing was wrong and that his sin was committed
              intentionally, for example, committing adultery or eating things that
              are forbidden, etc., and that these sins are common knowledge (14)
              among all Jews, then disclosure of his actions is conditional. If he
              is a typical Jew in all other respects who is generally observant and
              avoids most sins, and here we saw him violate a mitzvah privately
              only once, then disclosure of his actions to others would be forbidden
              even if this person was not present when this disclosure was made
              (15). And if it was disclosed, then the person who disclosed it is
              committing a serious crime in this respect because it is possible
              this person repented and is pained by thoughts of his sin and has
              thus been forgiven by Hashem, since the essence of Teshuvah is

   155

volume 2
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170