Page 185 - VOL-2
P. 185

Sefer Chafetz Chayim
                                    Hilchot Esurei Lashon Hara

                                            Kelal Dalet - Halachah 5

              appropriate to disclose his actions) to the relatives of the sinner (24)
              providing he would accept their reprimand. Please reference the
              Be’er Mayim Chayim.

              Note the sole motivation of the one who is reporting this person’s
              actions must be to uphold the Torah for the sake of Heaven and to be
              zealous for Hashem, and not for any other reasons of hatred or other
              ulterior motive that he may have. Also, the judicial authorities must
              chastise this person discretely (25) and not shame him publicly, as
              the Torah teaches (Vayikrah 19:17) “Reprimand your fellow Jew
              but don’t come to sin because of him.” All of this is relevant if two
              people saw this person committing the transgression, but if only one
              person witnessed it, he may not testify against his fellow Jew (26)
              since his solitary testimony would be pointless and would carry no
              judicial weight, as the Torah teaches (Devarim 19:15) “A solitary
              witness may not step forward and testify against another Jew in
              any intentional crime or unintentional offense” and if he does step
              forward he is doing nothing more than slandering this person.

              Our sages have taught (Gemara Pesachim 113b) that any solitary
              witness who steps forward to testify against his fellow Jew, etc. (the
              Beit Din will administer whiplashes to this solitary witness since
              his testimony is Lashon Hara). Furthermore, our sages of blessed
              memory have taught (113b) that HaKadosh Baruch Hu hates three
              people, one of whom being a solitary witness to an offense, such
              as adultery, who steps forward and testifies as to what he saw (this
              is hateful to Hashem because no judicial outcome can result from
              this testimony and so it is nothing more than a slander against these
              kinds of people). However this witness may disclose it discretely
              (27) to his rebbe or to someone who will keep the disclosure secret
              providing they would believe his sole testimony with the same
              authority as two witnesses (28). It is permissible for his rebbe to
              hate this person (the adulterer) and to distance himself from him
              until the matter is resolved and this person did appropriate Teshuvah.
              But it is forbidden for this rebbe to relate this story to others since
              that would be no better than if he himself witnessed this person’s
              actions and could not disclose it to anyone else because he was
              only a solitary witness, as I discussed in the prior 4th halacha of this
              Kelal.

   175

volume 2
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190