Page 130 - FGLN SC Onboarding Binder 2021
P. 130
Glossary of Terms
1 “THE PROBLEM”
2 SCOPE
3 SCALE
4 SUSTAINABILITY
POPULATION-
5 LEVEL
ACCOUNTABILITY
6 RESULTS
STATMENTS
7 INDICATOR
8 SOLUTIONS
11 ACTION PLAN
12 SPECIFICITY?
13 LEVERAGE?
14 VALUES?
15 REACH?
COMMUNICATION
16 POWER
17 PROXY POWER
18 DATA POWER
The unfavorable conditions of well-being, such as illiteracy, basic skills gaps, lack of proficient reading, writing, and mathematic skills, and lack of sufficient social supports or needs.
Specific, measurable, achievable, and realistic objectives and goals generally identified in planning, and formalized during implementation.
THE BIG PICTURE
The potential to expand or accommodate growth, increase performance, and improve overall efficiency of a system, network, or process.
BIG ENOUGH TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Using resources in a manner that prevents exhaustion. Including concepts of financial planning, as well as leadership succession, adaptability and strategic planning. **
A system or process for holding people in a geographic area responsible for the well-being of the total population or a defined subpopulation
A condition of well-being for entire populations (children, adults, families and communities)
A measure that helps quantify the direct achievement of a Result
An objective or vision that has a reasoned chance of producing a desired
result
A system or process for holding managers and workers responsible for the performance of their programs, strategies, and initiatives.
A measure of how well a program, agency or service system is working towards achieving strategic ends.
A coherent set of individual actions that have a reasoned chance of producing a desired solution.
Is the idea specific enough to be implemented? This is a threshold question, because it is hard to judge an action on the other criteria if it is not specific enough to be accomplished.
How much difference will the proposed action make on results, indicators, and turning the curve? This is the most important of the criteria.
Is it consistent with our personal and community values? There are many actions that are specific and high leverage but not consistent with our values. Is it feasible and affordable? Can it actually be done and when? No-cost and low-cost actions will rate higher here.
Does the metric communicate to a broad and diverse audience? This criterion is sometimes called the public square test. The data must be common sense and compelling.
Also known as representation power, does this metric say something of central importance about the result? Can this measure stand as a proxy or representative for the plain language statement of well-being?
Do we have quality data on a timely basis? Is the data reliable and consistent? To what extent do we have the data at the state, county, city and community levels?
PERFORMANCE
9
10 PERFORMANCE
ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES
Glossary of Terms
Criteria for Selecting Criteria for Selecting Accountability Terms Context Terms Measures Solutions & Actions