Page 35 - May-June 2018 GSE Report Flip Book
P. 35

            FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC MAJAYN-UAJRUYNE20210818
  COMPARISON OF SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS BLUEPRINT TO OTHER PROPOSALS
Figure 10: Comparison of Safety and Soundness Blueprint to Other Proposals23
   ‘KILL’ GSES
2013 SENATE BILL
  URBAN INSTITUTE PLAN1
RECAP & RELEASE
  2017 MBA PLAN
 2017 ICBA PRINCIPLES
SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS BLUEPRINT
Ends the failed business
model arbitraging ✔ ✔ ✔ ? ✔ ✔ cheap funding
 ✔
 Puts new private capital in a first loss position
✔✔✔✔✔✔
 ✔
 Maintains the 30-year mortgage
✖✔✔✔✔✔
✔
 Provides explicit, paid-for,
support to ensure stable ✖ ✔ ✔ ? ✔ ✔ market for legacy obligations
 ✔
 Feasibly maintains market
access to non-bank and non- ✖ ✖ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ SIFI mortgage originators
 ✔
 Maintains affordable housing initiatives
✖✖✔?✔✔
  ✔
 Does not disrupt mortgage rates, home prices, TBA markets and other Agency- related financial markets
✖✖✖✔✔✔
✔
 Allows Treasury to capture
proceeds from monetizing ✖ ✖ ✖ ✔ ? ✔ GSE warrants
  ✔
 Explicitly limits government support, and allows this limited support to be reduced over time
✔✖✖?✖✖
✔
 Quick and feasible implementation
✖✖✖✖✖✖
 ✔
   Source: Blueprint for Restoring Safety and Soundness to the GSEs, Moelis & Company LLC, June 2017
Blueprint for Restoring Safety and Soundness to the GSEs 26 © 2018 by Canfield Press, LLC. All rights reserved. www.canfieldpress.com 35
   
























































   33   34   35   36   37