Page 164 - Flipping book The Adam Paradox Hypothesis - Second Edition.pdf

The Ādam Paradox Hypothesis 141
Inflection and Slope: Why APH Explains What Others Cannot
The Qur
ʾān’s framing of human origins—from a single soul, a mate, and the
dispersion of many men and women (Q 4:1)—anticipates with striking precision what
population genetics and archaeology now confirm. Modern coalescent analyses
reveal that humanity passed through a razor-thin bottleneck, numbering only a
few thousand breeding individuals. Yet from this fragile base, a multiplication
began—not random, but ignited by cognition and sustained through symbols.
Revelation here functions not as metaphor but as beacon, pointing toward the
very inflection point science has only recently resolved.
The great debate in anthropology has long been whether numbers or minds
came first. Advocates of the demographic-first model argue that dense
populations preserved innovations and allowed culture to accumulate. Their
simulations and archaeological evidence from post-50,000 years ago seem
persuasive. Yet the model collapses under its own weight: how could large
groups form without symbolic trust already in place? Without symbols,
cooperation fragments and populations remain fragile.
On the other side, the cognition-first model insists that symbolic thought
ignited the possibility of scaling, not the reverse. This explains why
Neanderthals—despite their brain size and local densities—never achieved
sustained symbolic culture. But taken alone, this model underplays the
accelerating role of population once symbols existed.
The Adam Paradox Hypothesis resolves this impasse. It demonstrates that
cognition is the ignition and demography the accelerant. Symbols, rituals, and
myths externalized trust, allowing cooperation among strangers and safe
expansion beyond kin. Once groups grew, population density amplified the
preservation and spread of innovations. Demography explains the slope of the
cultural curve; cognition explains its inflection point.