Page 25 - Flipping book The Adam Paradox Hypothesis - Second Edition.pdf

The Ādam Paradox Hypothesis 2
This was not a gradual buildup. It was an eruption. A fire that caught across
populations and continents and never went out.
This contrast—anatomical modernity without cognitive modernity, followed
by sudden ignition—is what I call The Adam Paradox.
The First Strand: Anatomy Without Story
Fossils preserve our bones but not our thoughts. And what the bones reveal
is striking: humans with modern skeletons and brains existed long before
symbolic culture.
At Jebel Irhoud, five individuals dating to ~315,000 years ago show long,
low braincases but faces that look unmistakably modern (Hublin et al.,
2017). Their cranial capacities (~1,400 cc) fall well within the range of
present-day humans. At Omo Kibish, dated to ~195,000 years ago, the
skeleton of Omo I shows fully modern postcranial anatomy—long legs,
delicate skeleton, and rounded cranium (McDougall et al., 2005). At Herto,
skulls from ~160,000 years ago appear slightly elongated but clearly
transitional toward modern forms (White et al., 2003). Skhul and Qafzeh in
the Levant add burials of modern humans between 120,000–90,000 years
ago (Vandermeersch, 1981).
Table 1.1— Fossil Milestones of Anatomical Modernity
Here we see a species whose hardware was complete: brains as large as ours, bodies adapted to
awide range of environments. And yet, thes software of symbolic culture was absent.
Paleoanthropologist Ian Tattersall captures this tension: “The emergence of
modern human cognition was not a simple extrapolation of earlier trends. It was a
qualitative event” (Tattersall, 2012, p. 192).
The body was ready. The story was missing.