Page 275 - Flipping book The Adam Paradox Hypothesis - Second Edition.pdf

The Ādam Paradox Hypothesis 252
Long-Term Vision
The measure of APH is not consensus but scientific fertility. By 2045, the
hypothesis should have produced:
A cross-disciplinary data repository uniting genomics, archaeology, and
neuroscience.
A generation of scholars trained to treat human origins as a testable
threshold problem, not an untouchable mystery.
Either a confirmed ignition model, or a sharpened gradualist model
stronger than before.
In both outcomes, science wins. APH succeeds not because it is always right,
but because it is always testable, generative, and bold enough to fail.
This roadmap transforms APH from a thesis into a decadal scientific program
—a challenge to universities, labs, and research institutes: do not debate only
in words; test it in data, fossils, and neurons.
“The Adam Paradox Hypothesis endures as a beacon: unshaken by
argument, unbroken by test, and unwavering in guiding science toward the
straight path of truth in human origins.
”
Yulian Roess