Page 97 - Flipping book The Adam Paradox Hypothesis - Second Edition.pdf

The Ādam Paradox Hypothesis
74
The question, then, is stark: why the long silence, and why the sudden ignition?
This “threshold paradox
” has provoked decades of debate. Evolutionary
scientists have advanced elegant models to account for it. But as we shall see,
these models suffer from deep scientific and logical weaknesses.
The Adam Paradox Hypothesis (APH) proposes an alternative: that God
selected a ready genome — refined clay (ṣalṣāl ka-l-fakhkhār, Q 55:14) — and
activated it through divine genetic engineering and the infusion of rūḥ and ʿilm.
Adam, created with purpose as khalīfah, represents the ignition of symbolic
cognition. The archaeological threshold around 70,000 years ago reflects not
the invention of symbolism, but its global manifestation through Adam’s
descendants.
Figure 9.1 — Fossils and Artifacts Timeline (200k–30kya).
The timeline illustrates the chronological gap between early fossil evidence of anatomically modern
humans and the later emergence of durable symbolic artifacts. Fossils such as Jebel Irhoud (~315kya),
Omo Kibish (~195kya), and Herto (~160kya) show that modern anatomy was established long
before symbolic behavior became widespread. Early symbolic traces, like Qafzeh burials (~90kya),
Blombos ochre engravings (~77kya), and Diepkloof engraved ostrich eggshells (~60kya), appear
sporadically but fade without continuity. In contrast, by ~40–35kya, the archaeological record reveals
a global cultural explosion: Aurignacian cave art in Europe and Venus figurines, signaling the
irreversible threshold of symbolic cognition.