Page 105 - UKZN Proceedings of the Conference Report

Pesonen, M. eds. The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Saaty, T.L. 2004. Fundamentals of the analytic network process-dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13, pp. 129-157.
Saaty, T.L. 2008a. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, pp. 83-98.
Saaty, T.L. 2008b. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making - why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors: The Analytic Hierarchy/ Network Process. Statistics and Operations Research, 102, pp. 251-318.
Saaty, T.L. 2013. The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ ANP approach. Operations Research, 61, pp. 1101-1118.
Saaty, T.L. 2016. The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making. In: Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. and Figueira, J.R. eds. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of The Art Surveys. New York: Springer.
Sadiq, I.Z., Usman, A., Muhammad, A. and Ahmad, K.H. 2024. Sample size calculation in biomedical, clinical and biological sciences research. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences, pp. 1-9.
Scealy, J.L. and Wood, A.T.A. 2023. Score matching for compositional distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 118, pp. 1811-1823.
Seo, H. and Myeong, S. 2020. The priority of factors of building government as a platform with analytic hierarchy process analysis. Sustainability, 12(14), p.5615.
Siekelova, A., Podhorska, I. and Imppola, J.J. 2021. Analytic Hierarchy process in multiple–criteria decision–making: A model example. SHS Web of Conferences, 90, p. 01019.
Singh, M. and Pant, M. 2021. A review of selected weighing methods in MCDM with a case study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 12, pp. 126-144.
Expert Choice Solutions. 2023. Expert Choice Comparison AHP Software for Collaborative Decision Making Solution [Online]. Available: https://www.expertchoice.com/ [Accessed].
Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. 2022. The applications of MCDM Methods in Covid-19 pandemic: A state of the art review. Applied Soft Computing, 126, p. 109238.
Stofkova, J., Krejnus, M., Stofkova, K.R., Malega, P. and Binasova, V. 2022. Use of the analytic hierarchy process and selected methods in the managerial decision-making process in the context of sustainable development. Sustainability, 14, p. 11546.
Tanoumand, N., Ozdemir, D.Y., Kilic, K. and Ahmed, F. 2017. Selecting Cloud Computing Service Provider With Fuzzy AHP. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (Fuzz-IEEE) 2017. New York: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
Tekile, H.A., Brunelli, M. and Fedrizzi, M. 2023. A numerical comparative study of completion methods for pairwise comparison matrices. Operations Research Perspectives, 10, p. 100272.
Tindale, R.S. and Winget, J.R. 2019. Group Decision-Making. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi. org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.262
TransparentChoice. 2024. Software That Transforms The Way You Make Decisions. https://www.transparentchoice. com/software
Tu, J., Wu, Z. and Pedrycz, W. 2023. Priority Ranking For The Best-Worst Method. Information Sciences, 635, pp. 42-55.
Vargas, L.G. 1982. Reciprocal Matrices With Random Coefficients. Mathematical Modeling, 3, pp. 68-91.
Vargas, L.G. 2008. The Consistency Index in Reciprocal Matrices: Comparison of Deterministic and Statistical Approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 191, pp. 454-463.
Veisi, H., Deihimfard, R., Shahmohammadi, A. and Hydarzadeh, Y. 2022. Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in a multi-criteria selection of agricultural irrigation systems. Agricultural Water Management, 267, p.107619.
Vinogradova-Zinkevič, I., Podvezko, V. and Zavadskas, E.K. 2021. Comparative Assessment of the Stability of AHP and FAHP MepaHods. Symmetry, 13, p. 479.
World Economic Forum. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How To Respond [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/Agenda/2016/01/ The-Fourth-Industrial-Revolution-What-It-Means-And- How-To-Respond/
Yuan, R., Wu, Z. and Tu, J. 2023. Large-Scale Group Decision- Making with Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations: The Perspective Of Ordinal Consistency. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 454, pp. 100-124.
Proceedings of the conference on Public innovation, develoPment and sustainability | 103