Page 2 - Aerotech News and Review, April 5, 2019
P. 2

Viewpoint
A U.S. Marine Corps F-35B from Air Test and Evaluation Squadron 23 (VX-23), Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., undergoes a ground test of an improved probe light assembly in an Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., hangar Feb. 28. The F-35 program recently completed testing on an improved lighting assembly with the KC-135 Stratotanker that will enable the Navy and Marine Corps F-35 variants to refuel behind the tanker at night. Flight testing of the redesigned light, which attaches to a refueling probe, was led by Patuxent River Naval Air Station, Md., and supported by Edwards.
How to contact Aerotech News and Review
• Mail: 220 E. Ave. K-4, #7 Lancaster CA 93535
• E-Mail: editor@aerotechnews.com • Phone: (661) 945-5634
• Fax: (661) 723-7757
Advertising
Corporate Headquarters: (877) 247-9288
Subscriber Services
Subscriptions to Aerotech News and Review are $59 for six months or $89 for one year. For more in- formation, contact the subscription department at:
220 E. Ave. K-4, #7, Lancaster CA 93535
Story ideas, letters, editorials
Please address all letters and edi- torials to Stuart A. Ibberson, editor, 220 E. Ave. K-4, # 7, Lancaster
CA 93535
Web Site
Access the Aerotech News web site at www.aerotechnews.com
Submissions for upcoming events, air shows and museums should be ad- dressed to Web Updates, 220 E. Ave. K-4, # 7, Lancaster CA 93535
For questions concerning the web site, contact the webmaster at webmaster@ aerotechnews.com.
Where you can get Aerotech News and Review
For information on Aerotech distribution, call (661) 945-5634 or e-mail delivery@aerotechnews.com.
Aerotech News and Review is published the first and third Fridays of each month, serving the aerospace and defense industry of Southern California, Nevada and Arizona. News and ad copy deadline is noon on the Tuesday prior to publication. The publisher assumes no responsibility for error in ads other than space used. Your comments are welcomed and encouraged. Write to the address below.
• Publisher .........................Paul Kinison
• Business Manager.............Lisa Kinison
• Editor..............................StuartIbberson
• National Advertising
Manager ..........................Paul Kinison
Aerotech News and Review
220 E. Ave. K-4, #7
Lancaster, CA 93535
e-mail: editor@aerotechnews.com Visit our web site at www.aerotechnews.com
Delivering performance
Lockheed Martin photograph by Jonathan Case
by Brig. Gen. E. John Teichert
412th Test Wing commadner
EDW ARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif.—
Last month, the developmental test team at Ed- wards Air Force Base and the Air Force Test Center completed a vital test effort that directly impacted the warfighter.
It was a joint effort with combat capability on the line. It didn’t take a decade to complete; it didn’t take a year or even six months. In fact, this critical test took less than a month from the ini- tial program office request until the testing was finished and decision-quality data were delivered to the customer.
Recently, the F-35 Joint Program Office be- came aware that there was a problem with its Navy and Marine Corps F-35s that limited their ability to fully employ and train at night.
The operational community had determined that the existing F-35 B/C air refueling probe light was inadequate for KC-135 drogue opera- tions, and an immediate fix was needed for home station and deployed forces. That word quickly made its way to Edwards AFB — “the Center of the Aerospace Testing Universe” — and the team sprang into action. In doing so, they punctuated the meaning of National Defense Strategy guid- ance to provide “the capabilities and agility re- quired to prevail in conflict and preserve peace through strength” by “delivering performance at the speed of relevance.”
The 412th Test Wing at Edwards wasn’t sit- ting idly by waiting for this urgent need. In fact, the F-35 test team was busy testing new combat software, qualifying the automatic ground colli- sion avoidance system, and certifying the F-35 to refuel behind the KC-46. Tanker test professionals
2
were busy certifying F-35 and C-130 receivers paired with the KC-46, and preparing for certifi- cation of B-2 and F-22 receivers. They were also engaged in writing numerous reports to support the KC-46 acquisition decisions and Initial Op- erational Test and Evaluation.
Additionally, tanker test teams were busy test- ing fixes to KC-135 autopilot software to be in- corporated into future operational software. The entire team was already focused on important warfighter needs, but this particular requirement was too important to let linger. Thus, the Edwards AFB team shuffled manpower and resources to plan, support, execute, and report on this F-35B and F-35C test program with minimal interruption to their other important priorities.
The next days were filled with a textbook ex- ample of AFTC’s enduring principles:
• World-Class Risk Management
• Customized Teams and Products
• Relentless Focus on the Warfighter
The Navy and Marine Corps test team crafted
an initial test plan that was reviewed by the Air Force team charged with executing the testing.
Edwards AFB test professionals created an integrated Test and Safety Review Board tailor- made to ensure test adequacy and apply proper risk management, while maintaining constant commu- nication with the F-35 and tanker program offices. The test experts then conducted ground testing of the lighting alternatives and selected the one most likely to resolve the concerns, followed by flight testing in fleeting operationally relevant conditions to verify the fix. The success of the modified air refueling probe light was quickly fed to the F-35 JPO to drive an immediate fielding decision to lift nighttime restrictions.
All of this was accomplished in less than a month! In doing so, it showcased the agility and innovative spirit of those charged with shaping and molding America’s arsenal through devel- opmental test and evaluation.
It didn’t require a declaration of a test ac- celeration. It didn’t require the establishment of a Joint Urgent Operational Need. It didn’t require up-front funding from the program of- fice. It didn’t require a formal task passed down through the chain of command. It only required the dedication of a test team determined to meet the needs of the warfighter by delivering perfor- mance at the speed of relevance.
Aerotech News and Review
April 5, 2019
www.aerotechnews.com ........ facebook.com/aerotechnewsandreview


































































































   1   2   3   4   5