Page 3 - JIMMY REARDON LETTER TO CHICAGO CRITICS 
        P. 3
     ffffff
Almost immediately the movie got snapped up by Fox and then it was changed 
with input from Fox publicity. The changes took almost two years. By the time 
the revised movie came out in theaters River had done two other starring roles and 
was being advised by his agents and his mother not to talk too much about the Fox 
movie, now altered by studio hacks, which by this time Fox had decided was not 
worthy to be shown to critics like those of you at the Chicago Film Critics Associa- 
tion.
It wasn’t supposed to be like that.
I found out at lunch one day that newly installed Island President Russell Schwartz 
had sold the distribution rights to Fox and that Fox was going to do a new cam- 
paign. I said I liked the present campaign and didn’t want to delay the release of 
the picture. He said that Island was iling for bankruptcy and had no choice and 
anyway the deal was done. I thought something like: how bad could this be? Our 
low budget on-location indie gets a wide release by a major studio. How bad could 
this be?
At irst the front page Variety article about the “Fox pick up” of our Island Pictures 
independent ilm seemed good luck. But then the anguish set in. Russell Schwartz 
said that Fox President Leonard Goldberg had screened the
movie at home in Malibu and felt that the whole ilm had the
wrong “tone” and that it was a “downer” and he was going to 
screen it for his publicity and marketing team to see what 
could be done.
After screening the movie for marketing chief Cynthia Wick
and the Fox publicists, Goldberg called Schwartz and told him to get rid of my nar- 
ration, Elmer Bernstein’s ‘heavy’ score, and as much of the voice over as possible. 
He said they had decided to make it a “teen exploitation picture.”
As the author of the original novel, who actually became a ilm director to assure 
the rightful passage of book to screen – which took 20 years to accomplish -- I was 
after suburban class satire and adolescent insight, not exploitation. (Very few nov- 
elists manage to direct their novels into movies. I happened to meet Norman 
Mailer when he was ilming his book, but there are not many others.)
3

