Page 71 - RICHERT VS. SORKIN THEFT OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT AND THE WEST WING
P. 71
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1.2 13 14 15 16 1.7 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. II.
Page
PI-AINTIFFS CONCEDE THAT THEIR ACTION ACATNST THE WGA DEFENDANTS ARISES UNDER LMRA $ 3OI, HENCE THE DERIVATIVE
STATE T-AW CI-AIMS ARE PREEMPTED ,........... '
1
PI-AINTIFFS SHOULD BE DENIED LEAVE TO ASSERT A DFR CI-AIM,
WHICH IS BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. ...,.....3
A. Irave Should Not Be Granted to File a Futile Amendment. . .. ... .. . ... ..3
B. Plaintiffs'DFRClaimAccrued,attheLatest,inNovembcr1995. .. .. ... 4
C. The MBA's Time Limits for Filing Cirievances Have No
Application Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
n. JACOBS v.CaSISINAPPOSI'IE ...................8 ru. PLAINTIFFS I]AVE NOT EXPLAINED TTIE BASIS FOR BURMESTER'S
LIABILITY. coNcl-tlsloN
.. .............9 .......10
