Page 23 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

1 THAT,

2
HE TALKS ABoUT A pRE_SETTLEIENT REvrEU, A
D
3
YET, THEY tlott,T TELL US I pLEfiEitTED
UHAT HAS BEEN IN TflE

4 PRE - SEITLEI'IENT R€VIE[.,. HE'S TO THAT.
REFUSED DO THIS IS
5
COOPERATION?

6 THE COURT: Is
THTS THREE YEARS DOWN THE RoAD,

7
I{R. JOHNSON, AI1D I I,}1 IS -. I
GUESS WHAT HEARTNG AND
I
'DON'T lrrAiiT T0 HEAR A WHOLE LOT ORE OF IT I
BECAUSE DOll,T
o
TIIII{K IT'S
GOIIIG TO GO AI,IYWHERE PRODUCIIVE THIS
AFTERI{OON ..
10 YOU FEEL THERE'S A
FAILURE TO CO}IPLY WITH THE TERIIS
OF
11 ttlE AGREEI|ENT OR yOU I,ANT IT
TO CHAMCTERTZE AS THE SprRrT
I
12 OF THE AOREE}IEI,IT, AND THINK TTIAT D,G.A. IS IT
EIITITLED
13 TO A
HAVE FORIi,IAL HEARING OI,I THE ISSUE,

14 IF yOU
AND r.,At{T T0 FILE A I,tOTI0t{ TO C0IPEL

'l.5
CERTAIN THINGS THAT YOU THINK
ARE REQUTRED UI{DER THE

16 AGREEI'EI{T AI{D SUPPORT IT WITH
WHATEVER DOCUIIENTATIOI{ OR
17 DECLARATIONS
OR ANYTHING ELSE, THERE SHOULD'BE AI{
ORDERLY
18
BRTEFING OF IT AND
THE COURT HAS TO IIAKE A DECISION.

19 you ALL [y
KNO!,, TENSTON FOR TRYING TO Do

20 THIIICS OtI A PRACTICE, ECONOMICAL, EFFICIENT I
WAY, AI{D UAS
21
EARELY FAIRLY SUCCESSFUL, EVEN WITH YOU ALL
DOII,IG THAT TO
22 DATE, BUT I THINK
WE'RE AT A 8IT OF AN II.IP.ASSE HERE
NOW,
I
23 AND SO THTNK YOU IIEED TO
FORI,TALIZE THE R€QUEST FOR THE

24
IIIFOR}IATION ANO THEN HAVE IT ADJUDICATED.

I
2E I'IR. JoHI{SON: IIAVE THREE IIORE POINTS
.
26 },fIAT I'II
ASKII{G FOR IS JUST INFOR}IATION
IiOW.
27 WI.{ERE ARE WE AT? TIIAT'S I,}I
WHAT ASKII,IG FOR, WHERE ARE
AT?
2A
WE FIVE YEARS OO}/I{ THE ROAD,
HOW IIUCH IIONEY
YOU
'jAVE

,r$!yl!IA D. DARDEN, csR