Page 4 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010

CASE
1 UfiBER:
8C377780

2
CASE
I{AI4E;
RIC1IERT VS. IIRITERS OUILD

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, 10,
JAI.IUARY 2012

4 DEPARTI.IENT 322
HOI'I. CARL J . WEST,
JUDGE
5
APPEARAiICES : (AS HERETOFORE I{OTED,
}
6 REPORTER: D.
KENYNIA DARDEN, CSR #12704

7
TIME:
1:57 P.ll.

8

I ,
(|{HEREUPON FoLlol{rt{c pRocEEDT GS
TJERE
10
HELo iN opE
CoURT: )

12 THE COURTI GOOO AFTERiIoON, LADIES AND
GEI{TLEI.IEI{.
13 OI{
THE WRITERS GUILD, DIRECTORS GUILD, AND SCRE!I{},RITERS

14
GUILD, I THINK WE'RE SEI A
FOR STATUS COI{FERENCE,

15 I'VE GONE THROUGH
YOUR STATEIIETiTS AI{D

16 PROVIDED YOU I{iTI{ A',I OUTLINE OF TIY THOUG}ITS OF
WHAT'S
17 IN .-
PRESENTED THOSE STATEI.IENTS. LET'S GO THROUGH I{E,LL

t8 START I,IITH THE
RICHERT }JRTTERS GUILD CASE.

19
OtI THE K,P.}'.G, DRAFT
REPORT, AI,IYBODY WA T

20 T0 C0lltlENT 0N MY CO HENTS, oR IT SEE S TO LE ttE
0UGHT To
BE
21 AELE TO OET THIS ON THE TABL€ AI{D CET IT RESOLVED.

22 }lR. JoHNSo : ]ty
UNDERSrAa{DING IS THAT

23 !1R. JASKO, HHO IS OUR
CONSULTANT, HAS HAD A PNETTY GOOD

24 RELATIoI'ISHIP WITH itR. GoORE AT t,.G.A. l,,Ho IS
THE CFo, AltD
25
}IE'S
WORKII{G THROUGH T}iE ISSUES AS TO THE ATOU TS
BEII,IG
26 CIIARGED 0t{ FoREIGN IS
LEVIES; THAT RtcHr?

27 AND, SECONDLY,
THAT THE OTHER ISSUE HAD TO

28
DO WITH THE FLUCTUATIOTIS IN THE AIIOUNT. IN
SOITE YEARS,

KEMNIA D. DARDEN, CsR
PHoTocopwNA nE rea^t..D'or o$u,-;-;^
^