Page 9 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010
P. 9












1 GRANULAR DETATL OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL COLLECTION, IN 
EVERY 
2 IIiDIVIDUAL PAYOUT. .. 
AIID THAT FROII THE REPORT IHAT 
WE
J WERE LOOKING AT SEEI,IS TO ItE TO A 
BE I.IULTIPLE-PAGE REPORT 

4
I.,ITH A LOT OF PROBLEI.IS AtiD LOTS OF NU|{BERS ON IT; 
HOW IUCH 
IS IN 
5 II'IFOR}IATIOII IHAT AND CAII IT BE PROVIDEO IIi A 
SIJI,II,IARY 
6 FASHION, OR 
CAN YOU TAKE THE FOOTI}IGS OF ALL THE COLUI,II{S

7
AI'ID POST THAT INFORTIATION, AND A 
THEI{ HAVE GEI,IERAL SENSE 

OF WHAT WAS COLLECTED, WHAT WAS PAID OUT, AND 
WHAT,S 
I 
REI"IAINING TO BE PAID OUT.

10
I'R. JOHI'ISON: I 
JUST DON,T WANT TO SE€ ONE 
.- 
11 NU}IBER I'IONIES COLLECTED, }IONIES PAID -- 
OUT THAT 
IT 
'12
DOESN'T I^'ORK. HAS TO BE BROKEN DOWN BY YEARS. 
SO
13 -- -. 
EECAUSE THE WHOLE PROBLEIJ THE WHOLE REASON THIS 
CASE 
14 WAS BROUGHT I.{AS 
BECAUSE THE UNION HAD BEEI{ COLLECTING

15 lloliEY FoR oVER t5 YEARS. N0BODY KNEti IT; 
ABoUT HAD Nor 

16
PAID OUT VIRTUALLY ANY OF IT.

.- 
SO NOW WELL, ORIGINALLY, THIS CASE 
HAS 
't8 BEEN GETTINO THEIiI TO PAY, 
PROCESS THAT INCOI,,I€. WE ,{EED TO 
lo
-. 
KNOW AND BECAUSE IT'S A QUASI-PUBLIC 
EI{TITY AT THIS 
IT's 
20 POINT, BECAUSE coLLEoTIN6 oI{ 9EIIALF oF 
NOI.{.}IEI{BERs As
21 I.JELL, -- 
AND BECAUSE YOU OR I.'HOEVER SUCCEEDS YOU -- IS 

22 KEEPING A I.IONITOR TI{IS -- I 
ON YOU NEED TO HAVE, THII{K.

23 I'IIIIIIAL INFORIIATIOI{ AS WE, AS 
TO, ATTORNEYS, FOR IIIE CLASS 
IF 
24 TO KNOW PROGRESS IS BEING }!ADE,

25
you,LL 
AND SEE THAT TltAT,S t,ilAT,S NAppENItiG 

26 l,iITH THE D.G.A., llE .yOU 
WHEN GET TO THAT. THEY SAy, GoT 

27 NO INFOR}IATION, WHATSOEVER. 
WE,RE I{OT TELLI'.IG YOU

28
ANYIHING, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET YOU ANY 
IIIFORTiATION..





-. KENYNTA D. DARDEN, csR 
puo rocnDvt^E fE^
^. 



   7   8   9   10   11