Page 9 - RICHERT V. WGA - JUDGE WEST JAN 10 2010
P. 9
1 GRANULAR DETATL OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL COLLECTION, IN
EVERY
2 IIiDIVIDUAL PAYOUT. ..
AIID THAT FROII THE REPORT IHAT
WE
J WERE LOOKING AT SEEI,IS TO ItE TO A
BE I.IULTIPLE-PAGE REPORT
4
I.,ITH A LOT OF PROBLEI.IS AtiD LOTS OF NU|{BERS ON IT;
HOW IUCH
IS IN
5 II'IFOR}IATIOII IHAT AND CAII IT BE PROVIDEO IIi A
SIJI,II,IARY
6 FASHION, OR
CAN YOU TAKE THE FOOTI}IGS OF ALL THE COLUI,II{S
7
AI'ID POST THAT INFORTIATION, AND A
THEI{ HAVE GEI,IERAL SENSE
OF WHAT WAS COLLECTED, WHAT WAS PAID OUT, AND
WHAT,S
I
REI"IAINING TO BE PAID OUT.
10
I'R. JOHI'ISON: I
JUST DON,T WANT TO SE€ ONE
.-
11 NU}IBER I'IONIES COLLECTED, }IONIES PAID --
OUT THAT
IT
'12
DOESN'T I^'ORK. HAS TO BE BROKEN DOWN BY YEARS.
SO
13 -- -.
EECAUSE THE WHOLE PROBLEIJ THE WHOLE REASON THIS
CASE
14 WAS BROUGHT I.{AS
BECAUSE THE UNION HAD BEEI{ COLLECTING
15 lloliEY FoR oVER t5 YEARS. N0BODY KNEti IT;
ABoUT HAD Nor
16
PAID OUT VIRTUALLY ANY OF IT.
.-
SO NOW WELL, ORIGINALLY, THIS CASE
HAS
't8 BEEN GETTINO THEIiI TO PAY,
PROCESS THAT INCOI,,I€. WE ,{EED TO
lo
-.
KNOW AND BECAUSE IT'S A QUASI-PUBLIC
EI{TITY AT THIS
IT's
20 POINT, BECAUSE coLLEoTIN6 oI{ 9EIIALF oF
NOI.{.}IEI{BERs As
21 I.JELL, --
AND BECAUSE YOU OR I.'HOEVER SUCCEEDS YOU -- IS
22 KEEPING A I.IONITOR TI{IS -- I
ON YOU NEED TO HAVE, THII{K.
23 I'IIIIIIAL INFORIIATIOI{ AS WE, AS
TO, ATTORNEYS, FOR IIIE CLASS
IF
24 TO KNOW PROGRESS IS BEING }!ADE,
25
you,LL
AND SEE THAT TltAT,S t,ilAT,S NAppENItiG
26 l,iITH THE D.G.A., llE .yOU
WHEN GET TO THAT. THEY SAy, GoT
27 NO INFOR}IATION, WHATSOEVER.
WE,RE I{OT TELLI'.IG YOU
28
ANYIHING, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET YOU ANY
IIIFORTiATION..
-. KENYNTA D. DARDEN, csR
puo rocnDvt^E fE^
^.