Page 217 - Manual for Activities directed at the Underwater Cultural Heritage

216
The relevant demands on qualifications of staff come into view as well.
c. Coordination mechanism between bodies
As a site management plan always involves different bodies, with different interests and missions, it is essential that it specify mo- dalities of coordination. There may be one leading party that commits itself to inform the others and coordinate with them bilaterally as appropriate. Or, it can be agreed to have coordination meetings at regular intervals, during which the realization of the plan is evaluated on the basis of monitoring reports and during which the contribution of all partners is critically assessed. It is important to agree on coordination schemes from the very start. The coordination mechanism should include a system of informing and involving stakeholder groups, nationally and internationally, as they may arise. It may be appropriate to give this role to an experienced public archaeologist.
Principles for planning and actions
a. Objectives, targets, strategies
The objectives of a site management plan are anchored in general strategies and policies, such as a general commitment to protect the underwater cultural heritage according to the 2001 Convention. Other strategies and policies, however, such as culture in development, urban and regional planning, recreation and tourism are at stake as well. Such policies will all have their specific targets, which the management plan for an individual site can help to meet. Note, however, that the site itself is the main ‘object’. Deciding what is best for that particular site, considering its specific significance and opportunities is the main ‘objective’ of the site management plan. Several aspects, such as preservation, access, provisions for science and research should be integrated with this objective, as well as a vision for the future and sustainable use.
b. Masterplan of action
All actions that have been undertaken or
Conservation and site management