Page 11 - The Wreck of the Dutch East India Company Ship Haarlem in Table Bay 1647 and the Establishment of the Tavern of the Seas

The Wreck of the Dutch East India Company Ship ‘Haarlem’ 409
On 27 June, another storm picked up and continued into the next day. As a result, the wreck started to list on to its side. Weather conditions deteriorated and on 7 July it was reported that hail fell and that part of the stern of the wreck had collapsed. To protect the salvaged cargo from the elements, the pepper tent on the beach was treated with pitch and whale oil, as tar was not available. Some remains of the cargo from the wreck were salvaged intermittently and food supplies were replenished with fish from the Salt River. On 10 August some of the men went to the Salt River to repair the nets and upon their return they reported that they had encountered a group of approximately 50 Strandlopers, consisting of men, women and children. It seems, however, that during the winter months nothing much happened, as the entries in Leendert Jansz’s journal for this period refer mainly to the weather conditions and the amount of fish caught. This situation changed during the evening of 23 August, when a ship sailed into Table Bay.46
The next day, Jansz and 12 of his men went overland to the vessel. It turned out to be the VOC ship Tijger from the chamber of Amsterdam. Shortly afterwards Henriette Louise and Noord Munster from the Zeeland office also arrived in the roadstead.47 The outward-bound Tijger had left the roads at Texel on 7 May 1647 and met up with Henriette Louise and Noord Munster some time later. The ships sailed in convoy for part of the journey and entered Table Bay together on 24 August.48 The crew of the Haarlem must have received them with much joy, as no other ships had been observed since the departure of Witte Olifant and Schiedam on 12 April. During these four and a half months, the 62 people from Haarlem endured many difficulties.
Salvage activities on the wreck were carried out with great effort and under extreme conditions, while the weather was often terrible. Initial contacts with local indigenous people were made and although these did not result in conflict, there must have been an air of suspicion and mistrust between both groups, often overridden by feelings of curiosity.
Jansz obviously spent the night on board one of the ships and returned to the camp the next day. On 26 August he requested the commanding officers of the ships to send some commissioners for an inspection. Two days later the commissioners arrived at the fortification and were shown the camp and the Company’s goods that had been salvaged from the shipwreck. That same day one of the sailors who had stayed in the camp, Carel Cartoijs, was killed when his musket exploded.49 The commissioners, consisting of two merchants and the master of one of the VOC vessels, prepared a detailed report that gives a good impression of the way in which the fortification was constructed. The commissioners also referred to the wreck of the Haarlem, stating that the vessel had been cast very close to the ‘dry’ beach by the surf.50 It seemed that the people from the Haarlem had given their abode a name,
46 Ibid., 15: 17 Jun. until 23 Aug. 1647.
47 Ibid., 20: 23–24 Aug. 1647.
48 http://resources.huygens.knaw.nl/das/index_html_en under Tijger, Henriette Louise and
Noord Munster; WCA, VC 284, Journal and letters of Leendert Jansz, no. 2, 20: 24 Aug. 1647. 49 WCA, VC 284, Journal and letters of Leendert Jansz, no. 2, 20–1: 25–28 Aug. 1647.
50 Ibid., Rapport bij den oppercoopman Jacob Hussaert, schipper Thomas Mendoncq, en ondercoopman Dickx gedaen op haeren visite vant [ver]ongelucte schip ‘Haerlem’ No. 6, 34: 29 Aug. 1647.