Page 1 - When Client Relationships Don't End Amicably
P. 1

COLUMNS  | Tax Practice & Procedure






                                      When Client





                        Relationships Don't





                                  End Amicably












                                                          By Dan Davidson





                               t is never pleasant when a client relationship  not been paying the business’s taxes, or even
                               ends on less than amicable terms. This  filing returns, for a number of years. At the
                            Iis especially true when the relationship’s  end of March, Kent and the CPA discussed
                            demise leads to litigation. A contract dispute  these issues at length, and it became clear
                            that was recently litigated in bankruptcy court  that Kent needed to recreate the business’s
                            [In re Kent, 615 B.R. 171 (Bankr. W.D. Pa.  financial records and to file returns for the
                            2020)] highlights certain issues that CPAs  past six years.
                            should be aware of. These issues may be   The firm immediately undertook this chal-
                            particularly relevant in the current uncertain  lenging assignment, even though it did not
                            economic climate, when there is a heightened  have a written agreement with Kent. Another
                            risk that businesses will find themselves unable  partner, a CPA with forensic accounting
                            to pay their bills.                   experience, also worked on the assignment.
                                                                  This partner later testified that his overrid-
                            Background                            ing concern was with moving the project
                              John H. Kent was the sole proprietor of  forward quickly—especially given Kent’s
                            a business that performed work for utility  desire to rely on the anticipated work product
                            companies. In late 2016, Kent sought advice  at upcoming alimony and divorce hearings—
                            from a partner and CPA at an accounting firm  and that executing a formal agreement took
                            that Kent knew from prior work. Kent’s con-  second priority.
                            cern was that he and his wife—who was the   Obtaining the necessary information proved
                            business’s bookkeeper—might divorce. Kent  an ongoing challenge. Virtually all of the
                            spoke with the CPA for an hour about some  business’s records were on Kent’s wife’s lap-
                            of the business issues divorce might create.  top, which she refused to provide. Kent was
                            The CPA did not bill Kent for this time, and  unable to answer even basic questions, like
                            they did not enter into a written agreement.   the nature of the business entity, or whether
                              In March 2017, Kent and his wife sepa-  it had any employees or made any tax filings
                            rated. Then, Kent suspected that his wife had  during the relevant time frame. Furthermore,



                                                                      DECEMBER 2020/JANUARY 2021 | THE CPA JOURNAL
                   68





                                                                                                                 12/29/20   8:12 PM
          00-12_01_2021-PracticeManagement-Davidson.indd   68
          00-12_01_2021-PracticeManagement-Davidson.indd   68                                                    12/29/20   8:12 PM
   1   2   3   4