Page 111 - Australian Defence Magazine Dec21-Jan22
P. 111

                 TACTICAL WATERCRAFT TO SERVE AND PROTECT
 THE SENTINEL ADVANTAGE
􏰋􏰚􏰞􏰣􏰗􏰝 􏰘􏰐􏰋􏰐􏰂􏰏􏰊􏰏􏰛􏰌
􏰀 􏰟􏰞􏰝􏰜􏰛􏰚􏰙􏰘􏰛􏰗􏰖 􏰔􏰚􏰞􏰓 􏰝􏰗􏰒􏰛 􏰑􏰗􏰝􏰗􏰚􏰐􏰛􏰏􏰞􏰝 􏰗􏰝􏰑􏰏􏰝􏰗􏰗􏰚􏰗􏰖 􏰎􏰏􏰑􏰎􏰍􏰖􏰗􏰝􏰜􏰏􏰛􏰌 􏰋􏰞􏰊􏰌􏰗􏰛􏰎􏰌􏰊􏰗􏰝􏰗 􏰉􏰈􏰇􏰆􏰅􏰄􏰃 􏰛􏰎􏰗 􏰜􏰛􏰚􏰗􏰝􏰑􏰛􏰎 􏰐􏰝􏰖 􏰖􏰙􏰚􏰐􏰂􏰏􏰊􏰏􏰛􏰌 􏰗􏰝􏰎􏰐􏰝􏰘􏰗 􏰞􏰋􏰗􏰚􏰐􏰛􏰏􏰞􏰝􏰐􏰊 􏰘􏰐􏰋􏰐􏰂􏰏􏰊􏰏􏰛􏰌􏰁
􏰀 􏰠􏰝􏰘􏰚􏰗􏰐􏰜􏰗􏰖􏰘􏰞􏰓􏰔􏰞􏰚􏰛􏰐􏰝􏰖􏰜􏰐􏰔􏰗􏰛􏰌􏰛􏰞􏰋􏰗􏰚􏰜􏰞􏰝􏰝􏰗􏰊􏰁􏰅􏰒􏰘􏰗􏰊􏰊􏰗􏰝􏰛 􏰜􏰛􏰐􏰂􏰏􏰊􏰏􏰛􏰌 􏰐􏰝􏰖 􏰜􏰗􏰐􏰢􏰗􏰗􏰋􏰏􏰝􏰑􏰁 􏰈􏰇􏰆􏰅 􏰐􏰂􏰜􏰞􏰚􏰂􏰜 􏰣􏰏􏰂􏰚􏰐􏰛􏰏􏰞􏰝􏰃 􏰚􏰗􏰖􏰙􏰘􏰏􏰝􏰑 􏰔􏰐􏰛􏰏􏰑􏰙􏰗 􏰏􏰝 􏰛􏰚􏰐􏰝􏰜􏰏􏰛 􏰐􏰝􏰖 􏰛􏰎􏰗 􏰚􏰏􏰜􏰢 􏰞􏰔 􏰏􏰝􏰤􏰙􏰚􏰏􏰗􏰜􏰁
􏰀 􏰥􏰐􏰒􏰏􏰓􏰙􏰓 􏰓􏰏􏰜􏰜􏰏􏰞􏰝 􏰐􏰣􏰐􏰏􏰊􏰐􏰂􏰏􏰊􏰏􏰛􏰌􏰁 􏰦􏰏􏰛􏰎 􏰝􏰞 􏰋􏰐􏰏􏰝􏰛􏰏􏰝􏰑􏰃 􏰖􏰗􏰊􏰐􏰓􏰏􏰝􏰐􏰛􏰏􏰝􏰑􏰃 􏰞􏰚 􏰘􏰞􏰚􏰚􏰞􏰜􏰏􏰞􏰝􏰃 􏰏􏰝 􏰜􏰏􏰛􏰙 􏰚􏰗􏰋􏰐􏰏􏰚􏰜 􏰐􏰚􏰗 􏰗􏰐􏰜􏰏􏰊􏰌 􏰋􏰗􏰚􏰔􏰞􏰚􏰓􏰗􏰖 􏰧􏰏􏰛􏰎 􏰝􏰞 􏰎􏰞􏰛 􏰧􏰞􏰚􏰢􏰜􏰃 􏰔􏰞􏰚 􏰊􏰞􏰝􏰑􏰗􏰚 􏰖􏰗􏰋􏰊􏰞􏰌􏰓􏰗􏰝􏰛 􏰐􏰖􏰣􏰐􏰝􏰛􏰐􏰑􏰗􏰁
􏰀 􏰈􏰏􏰑􏰎􏰍􏰚􏰗􏰊􏰏􏰐􏰂􏰏􏰊􏰏􏰛􏰌 􏰧􏰐􏰛􏰗􏰚􏰘􏰚􏰐􏰨 􏰧􏰏􏰛􏰎 􏰊􏰞􏰧 􏰓􏰐􏰏􏰝􏰛􏰗􏰝􏰐􏰝􏰘􏰗 􏰚􏰗􏰡􏰙􏰏􏰚􏰗􏰓􏰗􏰝􏰛􏰜 􏰚􏰗􏰖􏰙􏰘􏰗 􏰛􏰎􏰗 􏰧􏰎􏰞􏰊􏰗 􏰞􏰔 􏰊􏰏􏰔􏰗 􏰘􏰞􏰜􏰛􏰜 􏰛􏰞􏰑􏰗􏰛􏰎􏰗􏰚 􏰧􏰏􏰛􏰎 􏰞􏰙􏰛􏰜􏰛􏰐􏰝􏰖􏰏􏰝􏰑 􏰋􏰗􏰚􏰔􏰞􏰚􏰓􏰐􏰝􏰘􏰗􏰁
􏰋􏰔􏰑􏰫􏰑􏰚􏰞􏰙􏰋􏰪􏰘􏰞􏰓􏰪􏰐􏰙􏰩􏰛􏰎􏰗􏰜􏰗􏰝􏰛􏰏􏰝􏰗􏰊
                tralia’s history – at least in terms of de- fence – occurred on 16 September with the Prime Minister’s decision to terminate the Attack-class submarine (Sea 1000) contract with France’s Naval Group and instead pursue options for a British or US nuclear-powered boat. An 18-month study will now be undertaken to decide the best way forward.
The Prime Minister promised the new submarines – either British Astute-class, or US Virginia-class boats – will be built in Adelaide, with the first ‘in the water’ by 2040. However, when the recently-appoint- ed Chief of Nuclear-Powered Submarine Task Force, Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead was asked what the PM meant by ‘in the water’ during the recent Senate Estimates hearing, he could not provide an answer: “I can't interpret what the Prime Minister meant by 'in the water'. He made that an- nouncement, so it's not for me to indulge myself on whether that is trials or fully operational,” he testified. “But that is the right-hand marker. It is our intent over the next 18 months to work with the US and the UK to identify what the earliest time- line is in which we can have nuclear pow- ered submarines delivered to Australia.”
The decision not to proceed with Sea 1000 also has major implications for Navy’s current Collins-class diesel submarines and, as Julian Kerr explains in a more detailed account of the Senate Estimates hearing on page 26 of
111
 






















































































   109   110   111   112   113