Page 8 - arch4454

My Architectural Philosophy: If there is any power in design is a power
of synthesis. the more complex the prolem the more need for simplicity. the people move to live in the city.The three problem is scale,speed and scarcity of means which we will have to respond to this phenomenon. what we do? the answer is to channel people’s own building capacity. we use people power for building. the seconed problem is how to design that contribute to sustainability,with the right design
TED TALK
i
tsunami, with make the forest that may be able to laminate the water.design power of synthesis is trying to make a more efficient use of the scarcest resource in cities which is not money but coordination. be it the force of self construction the force of commonn sennse,the force of nature.all these forces need to be translated into form and what that form is modeling and shaping is not cement,ricks or woodit is life itself.
s
su
us
st
t
a
ai
n
nn
n
a
a
b
b
i
i
l
l
i
i
t
t
y
yi
is
sn
no
ot
th
hi
i
n
ng
g
b
bu
ut
t
t
th
he
e
r
r
i
ig
go
or
ro
ou
u
s
s
u
us
se
e
o
of
fc
co
o
m
mm
mo
on
n
s
se
en
ns
al
se
l
w
e
.
.
wa
t
th
he
ay
y
e
l
.
.w
w
e
la
as
s
t
ed
t
p
de
pr
es
ro
si
ob
i
g
b
l
n
t
g
n
n
n
l
e
em
ta
a
k
n
a
mi
ke
a
t
i
s
et
t
i
s
A NEW MUSEUM WING: we conventionally divide space into privat and public realms.to make good pulic space you have to erase the distinction between urbanispe,media design and so on. in mall musoum there is a huge disconnnnect we believe, between the communicative and discursive space
of the mall and the museums that line it to either side.they have passive relation ships between them. we become with idea of bubble inside the void that is
f
e
r
r
of iconiclasm and adoration, the bubble is an anti-monument.the ideals of participatory democ-racy are represented through supplensses rather than rigidity art and pulitic occupy an ambiguous sit outside the museum walls, ut inside of the museums core
TED TALK
f
e
e
ea
a
n
n
d
di
i
t
t
s
s
a
ai
i
r
r.
.
t
th
he
ee
ex
x
p
p
a
an
ns
s
i
io
on
t
io
o
n
h
he
es
na
al
l
r
sh
h
a
whay should tell story:form follows function had becom modernity’s ombitious manifest and detrimental straitjaket, what if form follow fiction. we could thing of architecture and uilding as a space of stories. architecture as organizational structure,at their core is indeed structural thinking like system how we can arrange things in a functional and experientialway? we could
think of architecture as complex systems of relationship both in a programmatic
a
activities. a uilding become as uren acter. In vertical village we thing aout creating a communal environment in which sharing thing was as great as having your own. I belive that architecture exxceed the domain of physical matter of the uilt environment, but is really about how we want to live our lives.
a
n
n
d
d
f
f
u
u
n
n
c
c
t
ti
io
on
na
ro
a
p
od
d
c
p
e
eo
ca
as
of
st
t
fi
e
er
it
ts
r
a
sc
as
s
l
co
o
n
lo
n
t
oo
ta
op
ai
i
n
po
ne
o
f
e
r
f
i
r
i
in
i
t
nt
ti
t
e
is
er
sc
rc
c
o
c
o
om
on
mb
nn
n
e
b
i
e
c
in
c
t
na
t
at
e
ed
t
d
i
i
o
o
n
n