Page 39 - test_constitution 100

ART. 14 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 39
Bondu Ramaswamy and Others v Bangalore Development Authority and Others, 2010(5) Kar. L.J. 177 (SC) : (2010)7 SCC 129.
State actions in contractual matters and judicial review - Discussed — Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress v State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2011 SC 1834 : (2011)5 SCC 29 : 2011 AIR SCW 2346.
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, AIR 1991 SC 537 : (1991)1 SCC 212.
Unguided discretion — State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar and Another, AIR 1952 SC 75 : 1952 Cri. L.J. 510 (SC).
Kunnathat Thathunni Moopil Nair v State of Kerala and Another, AIR 1961 SC 552.
A.N. Parasuraman v State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1990 SC 40 : (1989)4 SCC 683.
Cut-off Marks — P.V. Indiresan v Union of India and Others, (2011)8 SCC 441 : 2011 AIR SCW 4855.
Unnatural offences - Abridges both human dignity right to privacy and choice of citizenary. Unequal treatment to LGBT as a separate class of citizens is violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution. Partially struck down. (Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4321).
Subordinate Legislation — Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Limited and Others v Union of India and Others, AIR 1986 SC 515 : (1985)1 SCC 641.
Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act (1 of 2014) — The Act is not unconstitutional merely because there is no provision in the Act giving primacy of the opinion of CJ/His nominee in the selection of the Chairperson and members of Lokpal. (Just Society v Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 2428 : (2017)7 SCC 802).
Absence of Provision for Appeal or Revision is of no consequence —
Workmen of Meenakshi Mills Limited and Others v Meenakshi Mills Limited and Another, AIR 1994 SC 2696, 1992(3) SCR 409.
Ad hoc posts under FTC Scheme — Judicial Service Rules of different States - Discussed. — Brij Mohan Lal v Union of India, (2012)6 SCC 502 : 2012 AIR SCW 3906 : 2012(3) SCJ 680.
Indiscriminate application of the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2003 is violative of Articles 14 and 21. (Nikesh Tarachand Shah v Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 5500).
Adultery provision in S. 497 IPC is discriminatory, discriminates against woman on ground of sex only, suffers from vice of Art. 14, violates Art. 15(1) of the Constitution. Section 497 IPC struck down. AIR 1985 SC 1618 overruled. (Joseph Shine v Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4898 : 2018(6) Kar. L.J. 465 (SC).
A KLJ PUBLICATION