Page 73 - GALIET HEAVEN´S SCROLL IV

then His divine impetus and impulse would be a mere mimesis, for it would be His mimetic-poetic action that would bring forth the λόγος of the musical symmetries into being, creating all things, and manifesting them in reality, in all beauty and goodness.
Never would we doubt that God, a most sublime Grecianized Maker, could not create what Yahweh’s omnipotent capacious Word can be conceived to create, the good and evil. Yahweh’s jealousy and omnipotence can easily lead us to conceive He creates evil, the bad and the ugly, and all abounding cacophonies when we ignore Saint Agustin’s argument for God’s goodness in the mystery of His grand Divine Plan. By contrast, a Stoicized rational Yahweh can only create the dulcet from the dulcet, and euphonies from euphonies, and never cacophonies out of the dulcet or vice-versa. In the Grecian philosophic paradigm, unlike the Hebrew mythic paradigm, evil or sin arises out of ignorance or privation, or vice, or out of excess, or lack (Platonism, Stoicism, Aristotelianism), and not out of God’s Divine Will, or out of Adam and Eve’s wilful disobedience of God leading to The Fall, and to humanity’s taint with original sin.
Yahweh’s unspontaneous creative act, if within His mind (a Philonism), would consist of a threefold sequence: Idea- Ποίησις-Λόγος. First, He would think the Perfect Idea; then, He would bring forth heaven and earth and all things through his creative mimetic act by uttering the Λόγος. In this three-fold Idea-Ποίησις-Λόγος paradigm of creation, His creativity would be divinely poetic, mimetic, and rational, never excluding any of
—73—