Page 33 - GALIET KAFKABEL JOB, KANT AND MILTON: Omnipotence, Impotence and Rebellion IV+
P. 33
Galiet & Galiet
If the values of K’s friends are the values of Job’s friends [F].
• No one is innocent, pure.
• K is guilty .
• K must confess.
• If the values of K’s F are the values of Job’s F which are S
• Then, K’s F’s SG-T is Job’s F’s SG-T [SG-T = Satan Guilt Theology]
• Then,KisGandJobisG
Job, in Judaism’s moral order, is eternally guilty in the temporal eternal present. By cursing Yahweh in the present, which is the future, Job is guilty in the past, present and the future, which is the temporal eternal present. If Job were to be tried again, his goodness would eternally return to sin because he is condemned to curse Yahweh again and
159 “How then do you comfort me with empty words, while your answers are nothing but falsehood.” (Job 21:34). 33
Job Josef K Satan
God’s T = God is Unjust. Job’s T = God is Unjust.
F’s T = God is Just.159 Tf, confess
Job, Praised Friends, Condemned
Judge’s T = Judge is Unjust and Just (?) SGT = Everyone is Unjust. K’s T = Judge is Unjust
F’s T = Judge is Just (?) Tf, confess
Resistance
Confession (Oath 31)
From Innocenceàto moral descent “conjures Leviathan”
“submits” à Repents
“materialist”
“mistreats the rabble”
“Blameless”ànot “sinless”
Resistance
Confession (to Titorelli) – No Petition From Flaw or Guiltàto moral ascent
“conjures forces of Order” “submits”àDoes not Repent
“defends the unjustly accused” “defies until the end”
“Blameless”ànot “sinless”
G Punishes Fs T = God is Just.
High Court = Yahweh High Court Prosecutor = Satan
High Court = Judge
High Court Prosecutor = ?
Accusation | Whisper SatanàJob is Selfish
Accusation | Whisper ?àK = ?
If K fights S = G Scholars F
Job cursesàJob descends morally S Wins W
Conjecture
God Revolts against Satan Job restored
K cursesàK rises morally ?=S SLosesW
Conjecture
Satan Revolts against Judge K killed
Both Self-Interested | Hubris
Therefore, Both suffer
Job’s Criticism against Primitive Morality comes to naught in his restoration K’s criticism of the Moral or Secular Court comes to fruition in his execution
